Re: draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv6-smtp-requirement

Cyrus Daboo <daboo@cyrusoft.com> Wed, 09 July 2003 20:18 UTC

Received: from asgard.ietf.org (asgard.ietf.org [10.27.6.40]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA19939 for <ietf-web-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 16:18:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordomo by asgard.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.14) id 19aLC3-0004Qo-J1 for ietf-list@asgard.ietf.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2003 16:05:35 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([10.27.2.28]) by asgard.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19aIBG-00067l-TV for ietf@asgard.ietf.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2003 12:52:34 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA09681 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 12:52:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19aIBF-0000fD-00 for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2003 12:52:33 -0400
Received: from darius.cyrusoft.com ([63.163.82.2]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19aIBE-0000f7-00 for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2003 12:52:32 -0400
Received: from socrates.cyrusoft.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darius.cyrusoft.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA24251; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 12:41:02 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 12:44:51 -0400
From: Cyrus Daboo <daboo@cyrusoft.com>
To: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@itojun.org>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ngtrans-ipv6-smtp-requirement
Message-ID: <2147483647.1057754691@socrates.cyrusoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030709083130.1924F9F@coconut.itojun.org>
References: <20030709083130.1924F9F@coconut.itojun.org>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.0b3 (Mac OS/PPC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

--On Wednesday, July 9, 2003 5:31 PM +0900 Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino 
<itojun@itojun.org> wrote:

| 	I still want the document (or the contents of it) be published, as
| 	it contains critical guidelines for IPv6/v4 dual stack SMTP operation.
| 	I would like to ask IESG to decide and take appropriate actions,
| 	such as:
| 	- poke SMTP experts, let them work on the topic and produce an RFC
| 	- let me handle the document as an individual submission and publish
| 	  it as an RFC

The ietf-smtp mailing list is still active. Consider posting and discussing 
this document there:

<mailto:ietf-smtp@imc.org>

List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-smtp.imc.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@imc.org?body=subscribe>


-- 
Cyrus Daboo