Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]

"todd glassey" <tglassey@earthlink.net> Tue, 25 July 2006 01:17 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5BYC-0007VW-Ba; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:17:32 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5BYA-0007VQ-Ta for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:17:30 -0400
Received: from elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.63]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5BY9-0000tK-JI for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:17:30 -0400
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=nIvdMoi3R+witySbE5X6VmECruUnHAHS43x0EgtDFfLKLHQVOOW2Nwoo0vvxo0Wt; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [4.246.48.60] (helo=gw) by elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1G5BY8-0000KZ-61; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 21:17:29 -0400
Message-ID: <014501c6af88$18dd57d0$fb30f604@home.glassey.com>
From: todd glassey <tglassey@earthlink.net>
To: Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0607242045320.10935-100000@citation2.av8.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:16:14 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807
X-ELNK-Trace: 01b7a7e171bdf5911aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec799afde235f97a18d2f7c5a72d9db0523c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 4.246.48.60
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e8a67952aa972b528dd04570d58ad8fe
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Dean -
So then its the ISOC's formal process to officially refuse to comply with
Safe Harbor, the US DMCA and the EU's Security Requirements for electronic
processes? Cool - I am betting that means the US Government cannot
participate with them too, right?

By the way - what State's or Country's laws are the IETF's documents
governed under and why is this  not in any of the IETF's documents including
the Solicitation RFP itself???  My favorite is the Affidavit which comes
with a perjury clause in it with no statement of who's perjury laws were
being used? US? Virginia? California? who's ???

Todd Glassey

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dean Anderson" <dean@av8.com>
To: "Eliot Lear" <lear@cisco.com>
Cc: "todd glassey" <tglassey@earthlink.net>; "Thomas Narten"
<narten@us.ibm.com>; "Pete Resnick" <presnick@qualcomm.com>; "Frank
Ellermann" <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>; "Sam Hartman" <hartmans@mit.edu>;
<ietf@ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]


> This isn't true. The IETF, IESG, and IAB are activities of the ISOC. The
> ISOC is incorporated. A suit against the IETF, IESG, IAB activities
> names the ISOC. Losing such a suit, the ISOC complies with the court
> orders, pays the damages, and ultimately controls the money spent on
> IETF/IESG/IAB activities.
>
> --Dean
>
>  On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
> > todd glassey wrote:
> > > That requires a policy and approval by the ISOC - this is one of the
onerous
> > > failings of the ISOC as well.... that it let the IETF define its own
> > > contractual processes and their recourse models.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > The IETF is a community trust, and the ISOC was formed to maintain that
> > trust.  The IETF let itself be governed by the ISOC on that basis, not
> > the other way around.
> >
> > Eliot
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ietf mailing list
> > Ietf@ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> >
> >
>
> -- 
> Av8 Internet   Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
> www.av8.net         faster, more reliable, better service
> 617 344 9000
>
>


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf