Re: Last Call: <draft-gont-intarea-obsolete-eid-option-01.txt> (Obsoleting the Endpoint Identifier (EID) Option) to Proposed Standard
"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Fri, 05 October 2012 13:06 UTC
Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BEA921F8718 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 06:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.052, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WNfmTMpY03-h for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 06:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA2821F8673 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 06:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.80,541,1344236400"; d="p7s'?scan'208"; a="697668964"
Received: from smtp2.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.159.114]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 05 Oct 2012 06:06:52 -0700
Received: from vmwexceht05-prd.hq.netapp.com (exchsmtp.hq.netapp.com [10.106.77.35]) by smtp2.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id q95D6p0J026545 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 06:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.2.46]) by vmwexceht05-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.77.35]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 06:06:51 -0700
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-gont-intarea-obsolete-eid-option-01.txt> (Obsoleting the Endpoint Identifier (EID) Option) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Topic: Last Call: <draft-gont-intarea-obsolete-eid-option-01.txt> (Obsoleting the Endpoint Identifier (EID) Option) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AQHNol14vOGu/RwsD0SZ2JSaS6ZfWperJS4A
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 13:06:51 +0000
Message-ID: <D4D47BCFFE5A004F95D707546AC0D7E9068D415C@SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
References: <20121004182351.13598.41485.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20121004182351.13598.41485.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.104.60.115]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E71566AD-71DF-46E2-9568-F0E3F2FA07F1"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 13:06:54 -0000
On Oct 4, 2012, at 20:23, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote: > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider > the following document: > - 'Obsoleting the Endpoint Identifier (EID) Option' > <draft-gont-intarea-obsolete-eid-option-01.txt> as Proposed Standard Have the original authors been contacted? Also, I see no reason why this RFC would need to be standards track. Lars
- Re: Last Call: <draft-gont-intarea-obsolete-eid-o… Eggert, Lars
- Re: Last Call: <draft-gont-intarea-obsolete-eid-o… Noel Chiappa
- Re: Last Call: <draft-gont-intarea-obsolete-eid-o… Fernando Gont