IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: Telnet Authentication Option to Proposed Standard

joda@pdc.kth.se (Johan Danielsson) Tue, 23 November 1999 13:30 UTC

Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id IAA18320 for ietf-outbound.10@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 08:30:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from blubb.pdc.kth.se (blubb.pdc.kth.se [193.10.159.47]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id IAA14503 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 08:22:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from joda by blubb.pdc.kth.se with local (Exim 1.71 #3) id 11qFsm-0000LB-00; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 14:21:20 +0100
To: ietf-cat-wg@lists.stanford.edu
CC: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: Telnet Authentication Option to Proposed Standard
References: <199911221943.OAA13101@ietf.org>
From: joda@pdc.kth.se
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 14:21:19 +0100
In-Reply-To: The IESG's message of "Mon, 22 Nov 1999 14:43:33 -0500"
Message-ID: <xof1z9hgx80.fsf@blubb.pdc.kth.se>
Lines: 13
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070083 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.83) Emacs/20.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> writes:

> o Telnet Encryption: DES3 64 bit Cipher Feedback 
> 	<draft-altman-telnet-enc-des3-cfb-01.txt> 
> o Telnet Encryption: DES3 64 bit Output Feedback 
> 	<draft-altman-telnet-enc-des3-ofb-01.txt> 

Do these make sense at all? Do they provide any better security than
single des?

I haven't seen any discussion.

/Johan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email