IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-farrel-rtg-morality-requirements-00.txt

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@nokia.com> Wed, 17 November 2004 00:12 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA13884; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:12:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUDTT-0008DN-FI; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:15:04 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CUDMq-0001eN-86; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:08:12 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CUDDU-00087V-99 for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 18:58:32 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA12846 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 18:58:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from darkstar.iprg.nokia.com ([205.226.5.69]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CUDFm-0007qX-K0 for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:00:55 -0500
Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com (8.11.0/8.11.0-DARKSTAR) id iAGNTrS20528; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:29:53 -0800
X-mProtect: <200411162329> Nokia Silicon Valley Messaging Protection
Received: from dadhcp-172019069087.americas.nokia.com (172.19.69.87, claiming to be "l5131412.nokia.com") by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com smtpdJUQ3DI; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:29:51 PST
Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20041116155209.01e99ec0@mailhost.iprg.nokia.com>
X-Sender: hinden@mailhost.iprg.nokia.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:57:37 -0800
To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPX.4.58.0411161459540.18604@wells.cisco.com>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20041116161058.0264ec80@localhost> <Pine.HPX.4.58.0411161459540.18604@wells.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-farrel-rtg-morality-requirements-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32

Ole,

At 03:03 PM 11/16/2004, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
>Indeed.
>
>People polled after the election said they put Moral Values as the #1
>priorty. I see no reason why the previous and next administration won't
>make  a morality section a requirement in all published docs.

We should be proactive and create a morality area in the IETF.  The 
morality ADs can review and vote Discuss if the Morality Considerations 
section in drafts being reviewed by the IESG is not adequate.

>Is it April already?

Must be....

Bob



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email