Re: [Netconf] Last Call: <draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05.txt> (Time Capability in NETCONF) to Experimental RFC

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Mon, 29 June 2015 17:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705801B2BD5; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tVkYEDfLsGnN; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:17:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x230.google.com (mail-pd0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9DFC1B2BD3; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pdbep18 with SMTP id ep18so98286302pdb.1; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=GsAOnkQTG7bu9wfkZMA2tXgOXhM4VLkNVpphyUiuugw=; b=h1cgBlnSwa/RMzcQmJqEfhqhkcOTPOD+6WiFGiTC5ZOwewl0Tv/MfoM2o53fDr9n1d yYhoz5hsPkRi+PDtm0h+wf6KxfPQRKbTj7Scy3GMcaffOFUImobkXfVdLPvk7rkjB2qZ q9aN1q+MK8IKKkDzr9yeU+DlyqYCpzCGbE3koPVNn6NilXW4rgN4VHci9h8kW/Uma1ZP YkWquSGMiDqdfXZLEZuV+R2/ZrqnXpUA7PJbWwa1EgqIdiZ95kGZQp/xSCjmy21EAio9 rbRCpbXha0BkRtW2lT08KCgDsPlhuvvpZPhmAvmp6zK94etuQsjiJVv6IS5hzxw418qS FDYQ==
X-Received: by 10.70.43.169 with SMTP id x9mr33720899pdl.52.1435598236591; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sjc-mahesh-nitro3.cisco.com ([128.107.241.183]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id go5sm42808464pbd.36.2015.06.29.10.17.14 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:17:15 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_38C39B79-38E9-4874-B178-F93387A385BE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Last Call: <draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05.txt> (Time Capability in NETCONF) to Experimental RFC
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5CA78C61@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 10:17:13 -0700
Message-Id: <E13D2749-6C7D-45D9-9B87-D03E12DB59DC@gmail.com>
References: <20150629145822.7722.8876.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5CA78C61@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
To: "Dan Romascanu (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/V-ZwSDXbtVoALxvX0IwnOuH9W4c>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 08:44:11 -0700
Cc: "lmap@ietf.org" <lmap@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 17:17:19 -0000

Dan,

If you go into the archives of NETCONF and search for the draft, you will find some history on the draft.

It started by folks asking for questions and clarifications on the draft. Even after they were seemingly addressed, their was little or no support for adopting the draft into the WG both in IETF 92 and on the mailing list.

If you believe that there is a need for this work and able to get folks to review the draft and show support for it on the mailing list, the WG can relook at the draft. Making it experimental is always an option.

Cheers.

> On Jun 29, 2015, at 9:49 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:
> 
> (I apologize for cross-posting) but it seems justified in this case) 
> 
> I find this work useful. 
> 
> I have two questions: 
> - why was not this document adopted by the NETCONF WG? Lack of time, out of focus, or are there any other (technical?) reasons? Why did it had to go on AD-sponsored and Experimental track?
> - This work may potentially be useful for LMAP which has scheduling and time-stamping features in its architecture and framework. LMAP however just selected RESTCONF as their preferred protocol. What would it take to extend this work to RESTCONF)? (may be another piece of work)
> 
> Thanks and Regards,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: IETF-Announce [mailto:ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> The IESG
>> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 5:58 PM
>> To: IETF-Announce
>> Subject: Last Call: <draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05.txt> (Time
>> Capability in NETCONF) to Experimental RFC
>> 
>> 
>> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the
>> following document:
>> - 'Time Capability in NETCONF'
>>  <draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-05.txt> as Experimental RFC
>> 
>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
>> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
>> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2015-07-29. Exceptionally, comments may be
>> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of
>> the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>> 
>> Abstract
>> 
>> 
>>   This document defines a capability-based extension to the Network
>>   Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) that allows time-triggered
>>   configuration and management operations. This extension allows
>>   NETCONF clients to invoke configuration updates according to
>>   scheduled times, and allows NETCONF servers to attach timestamps to
>>   the data they send to NETCONF clients.
>> 
>> 
>> The Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) Capability URNs registry
>> requires a standards action in order to populate the registry. This document
>> was taken out of the ISE stream and brought forward as an AD sponsored
>> individual-submission to address this consideration.
>> 
>> 
>> The file can be obtained via
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
>> 3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dmm-2Dnetconf-2Dtime-
>> 2Dcapability_&d=AwICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNX
>> CJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=eIbq6OXE65r_w9lwmd5WrktViMncM
>> zhCDjk3tyjnVvU&s=B6e1FBSZH9H-
>> OYAnRMYEgTJVYQ6SSqa2K9XpuIyx3mI&e=
>> 
>> IESG discussion can be tracked via
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
>> 3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dmm-2Dnetconf-2Dtime-
>> 2Dcapability_ballot_&d=AwICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR3
>> 1OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=eIbq6OXE65r_w9lwmd5WrktVi
>> MncMzhCDjk3tyjnVvU&s=WbISmWkVGVo43riTMHY7kzIkAREkQrB2aq-
>> lyYOad-Y&e=
>> 
>> 
>> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com