Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Wed, 08 June 2011 11:56 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D0F11E80C9; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 04:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JGUEKQWNWVTA; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 04:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5B411E80C5; Wed, 8 Jun 2011 04:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1QUHMq-000DeK-Uk; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 07:56:13 -0400
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 07:56:11 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, Vint Cerf <vint@google.com>
Subject: Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-faltstrom-5892bis-04
Message-ID: <71EE769EE4C39C799F40668D@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <4DEF61F1.6040502@isode.com>
References: <4de22aaa.8aecd80a.3728.ffffa184@mx.google.com> <E54DF8D5-7299-4E6F-9AF0-78115585E23D@vpnc.org> <4dee03bf.d04ee50a.6936.ffff9483@mx.google.com> <1215FCFF-B566-4E52-88DD-233934F6460F@vpnc.org> <01C15A30F3CF4E4F60DCA1E9@PST.JCK.COM> <3751CF5C-FF3D-4EE0-A96B-BACC0DFC7B1B@vpnc.org> <BANLkTi=byyNLdFyogh0eicGT2yksa8gh3g@mail.gmail.com> <4DEF61F1.6040502@isode.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, draft-faltstrom-5892bis.all@tools.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:56:24 -0000

+1

--On Wednesday, June 08, 2011 12:50 +0100 Alexey Melnikov
<alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:

> Vint Cerf wrote:
> 
>> setting aside interpretation and semantics for a moment,
>> would there  be utility in maintaining tables for each
>> instance of Unicode?
> 
> Yes, because developers will have different versions of
> Unicode available to them. It would also help developers to
> migrate by seeing what has changed between versions.