IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-15.txt> (Security Automation and Continuous Monitoring (SACM) Requirements) to Informational RFC

"Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing@cisco.com> Sun, 25 June 2017 22:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ncamwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925601205F0; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 15:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LqHhYGKiDvgM; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 15:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CC391270A7; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 15:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1220; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1498431144; x=1499640744; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=ZTPXdGEtQo5Tbugrx/yDhIaNhjRDGw36YAL97AfuB/k=; b=TucWaRLqrw8PdTeOLZBa/WfsMnuJMMpSsJGqoci+qJJfqQfHHZ/AWeDR XENN4Z0jNj/I8Eo8Xzhe6I0Ut/kG4XFsosklZC+VwXzS9fqvmKLTAOpKE kwstwtduLtFlxQT6Jbf1MliuBPwXlkuAqLLo9PaoCAGxa7Vpz/ckvIhai c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C2AADvPVBZ/5pdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1higQ0Hg2WKGadZghGGJAIagm4/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRkGIxEzEhACAQYCDgwCHwcCAgIwFRACBAENBYosk3qdYoImi08BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEdgQuCHIUtK4J5hGqDEzCCMQEEnmkCk2WCCYVIikGJKot2AR84gQp0FVsBhS+BTXaIJIENAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,392,1493683200"; d="scan'208";a="440620179"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Jun 2017 22:52:23 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v5PMqMwO011665 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 25 Jun 2017 22:52:22 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 18:52:22 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 18:52:21 -0400
From: "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing@cisco.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-sacm-requirements@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sacm-requirements@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-15.txt> (Security Automation and Continuous Monitoring (SACM) Requirements) to Informational RFC
Thread-Topic: Last Call: <draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-15.txt> (Security Automation and Continuous Monitoring (SACM) Requirements) to Informational RFC
Thread-Index: AQHS6yKgeeUsKIXVRECt1adxstm+BqI2AtWA
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 22:52:21 +0000
Message-ID: <01D1AF10-ECE0-42AC-AD3D-5E31056ACACD@cisco.com>
References: <149547765333.16443.10840963581238733682.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <79A273B7-56C5-438D-BA99-976537813BC3@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <79A273B7-56C5-438D-BA99-976537813BC3@tzi.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1a.0.160910
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.86.253.68]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <BBF2A84C55BA534BBFB5E380F8B749E9@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/VPvDf62r-fzYMHRQclGxIUVvAoQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 22:52:27 -0000

Hi Carsten,

Fair point.  Will update in the next revision.

	Nancy

On 6/21/17, 11:41 PM, "Carsten Bormann" <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:

    Quote:
    
       Multiple data models, protocols, and transports may be employed in a
       SACM environment.  A SACM transport protocol is one that runs on top
       of L3 protocols such as TCP/IP or L4 protocols such as HTTP, carries
       operations (requests / responses), and moves data.
    
    Please expand abbreviations “L3” and “L4” on first (and apparently only) use.
    Preferably do not use these abbreviations here at all as they are customarily understood to stand for “Internet Layer” and “Transport Layer” as defined in RFC1122 Section 1.1.3 (while using OSI layer numbers purely for convenience).  This common meaning doesn’t appear to be meant here.
    
    Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email