municipal broadband

Bob Bivona <bbandnep@gmail.com> Mon, 19 October 2015 15:35 UTC

Return-Path: <bbandnep@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06BD1ACDB2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, LOTS_OF_MONEY=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IicOQWvy6rJn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x230.google.com (mail-io0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D9ED1ACD98 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:35:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ioll68 with SMTP id l68so34721586iol.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=A08MuJURjaP2/ww84cSUr28QHagNonQHqfeXn7uhS/4=; b=OmbZum6XnwbqnvqLRy1nL+D7FPciwHdcioj0VWwO500e34GTo3+p2j1tPpNJP/LD5Q i7xqvLz+AQsWIU2YlP/qnPozj6wuAbpiTTp5AFOiErq5tvgIGOMooNhGkDCKY63lUq4a eZwCt1CNnL4OuKAz0fo/4XnA5hhAZiOpvTNtoULwXYmWQG/J9fAiGkvpfyU9mCezCvLw ehvUTK7Jpt57wk0j315fkgDwoTezBHgnA2tQ7CN2EANOL0KV7bFoWc+bMvEkS0nDY8to qDN/f3nd5HVRiXzz1GMsABO8gY/lwBhVNfZIEgLutKjoHtXaueHVw7vUTC9wjm5FN2AF GZbg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.25.71 with SMTP id 68mr26573433ioz.46.1445268908767; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.84.18 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 11:35:08 -0400
Message-ID: <CAFoPTxZzfOBkrZREQZzzuqjG9g7akTA5=mNXOjE57s2CtUMiwg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: municipal broadband
From: Bob Bivona <bbandnep@gmail.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ff20ef07210052276e30c"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/VVqPUJjeJRobKfLBnuXU8Tpqxj0>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 08:46:31 -0700
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 15:40:35 -0000

I am doing research on the feasibility of municipal broadband and am trying
to determine approximate costs and would very much appreciate your
assistance. I understand costs would depend on many factors and am trying
to determine very roughly, what minimum costs would be for  fiber and
wireless broadband infrastructure per capita, or for a city of 100,000 of
average area. Chattanooga has a fiber municipal broadband system that cost
$414.5 million and has 55,000 subscribers (I am uncertain what the average
number of users per subscription is) for a cost per subscriber of $7,536.
Does this seem like a reasonable cost average per subscriber to you? I
understand that new wireless technologies exist that would allow cities to
offer similar speeds as fiber for much lower costs. Would you please tell
me if this is correct? Thank you very much.



Bob Bivona