Gen-ART LC Review of draft-iana-special-ipv4-registry-01
Ben Campbell <ben@estacado.net> Tue, 30 June 2009 20:17 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@estacado.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE3528C455 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.369
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.369 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.230, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D4pfa5UjBoX8 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:17:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from estacado.net (estacado-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:266::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB4C28C45C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.195] (adsl-68-94-46-125.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [68.94.46.125]) (authenticated bits=0) by estacado.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n5UKGHVP091592 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:16:21 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@estacado.net)
Message-Id: <DC1C53F9-577E-45E9-B4ED-6410D7A7893F@estacado.net>
From: Ben Campbell <ben@estacado.net>
To: leo.vegoda@icann.org, michelle.cotton@icann.org, gih@apnic.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Subject: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-iana-special-ipv4-registry-01
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:16:12 -0500
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:17:59 -0000
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-iana-special-ipv4-registry-01 Reviewer: Ben Campbell Review Date: 2009-06-30 IETF LC End Date: 2009-07-01 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as an informational RFC. I have some minor comments that should be addressed first. Major issues: None. Minor issues: -- section 2, first paragraph: Text refers to [rfc3330bis] but there is no corresponding entry in the references section. -- section 3, 2nd paragraph: Is [date] supposed to be a reference? If so, there is no corresponding item in the references section. If not, then I don't understand the intent of "...in [date]..." -- section 3, third paragraph: Should RFC5226 be a normative reference? It's not clear to me if the text means to say "this draft follows the policies..." or "further allocations MUST follow the policies". If the second, it would require a normative reference. -- IANA considerations, 2nd to last paragraph: How does this relate to the ability to state routing scopes in item 7? Nits/editorial comments: -- section 2, paragraph 1: Should the "." be a ":"? -- References The entries [IANA] and [RFC2928] are not referred to in the body of the draft.
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-iana-special-ipv4-regi… Ben Campbell
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-iana-special-ipv4-regi… Ben Campbell