Re: We gotta stop meeting like this

Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com> Tue, 23 July 2019 16:13 UTC

Return-Path: <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3990012015B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 09:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6dbiyJq2gTu1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 09:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 368DF12012C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 09:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com with SMTP id 2so29141579vso.8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 09:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=B488qS8bR2uZp44roT0tT8lAmsWW+NgrIt8DP+O+wZA=; b=u/rCyyE24q42wEniP+duAaElOZbVeZaoAsaNKLVLoETkQ7TZJ/0z7enOz1limwRX95 0+2k/XPnzcK2ONPSUMEpbguO2cSVxl9nUEHII/C3BYu5FnkAja4GvEe3GjSJlK4FZnY4 rNNxDXG5AImlWEGC5uSOGN3wxSih0R1G9h8b+LbClMnW7cz7hhOTWdmz4jPmv8Z1FwFG raQyy6ChImOLbT62Qn3t7sM6qKP6N9BEvm2keRgxtQxBKT7qf3huS05v0yEOPsbaSL4R CSiskEgevSw+oeGWGEmkikVvGlUYqQ57VEp3CTiT0CUKTr9OlpmVdYK2RCQ6yPxSl6mz DGiA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=B488qS8bR2uZp44roT0tT8lAmsWW+NgrIt8DP+O+wZA=; b=V80Eq3XODfJ4S05CsiP0IRBMst8pz+mqzCKQfJaegyDlPesEa76hkJa+B7QUOTgQra Eg1Pq75qDvpcJ8vpEZXa+s8vmXTmmAYOsLjb1ip0CUgRDcAc2Fa58hyI+3jvcNnr+Wny nULV19nY4GfhdRFzGztiYQxnOWjdgTvm09W4fU+wsgzHEsgJQRPw8/DdGXIw3kfbfS5y 90yIgC7sGm4kJbErdw2MpwpgS7mWtvtx16CLwp4PZV/QP1xNSlo/HO8ngdjPzFBV1JaZ cXXW3jFtXSjcuZzeWHkRim3YXuSUe/yFBDQ7rEBvjhsOIbGThEj1dkw9+3Y8q0P/cJaK mDsA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVRRoVWnmYWjOzP/1rtF6HBtpABulAfHPp8uROk73qDrohoJOAp +1a3HkzWU6HXeJiPuY+JyQJiueZp
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzPuVpjsyE6fUQgS32xajpx2mepeq7McsSNuVIO40tQvsNUN+G7YDDbyEmR5uhhap2SU0jy7g==
X-Received: by 2002:a67:6e44:: with SMTP id j65mr46303112vsc.132.1563898388000; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 09:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Windows10AnyBody.local ([190.142.55.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f140sm30850034vka.36.2019.07.23.09.13.07 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 09:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: We gotta stop meeting like this
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <9DCA912C-A4F7-4AC6-A6B3-7C399FF237CE@cisco.com>
From: Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <b4b359a8-bffa-4920-c640-ee7ac591d4d5@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:13:05 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9DCA912C-A4F7-4AC6-A6B3-7C399FF237CE@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------FB8B6B7492DA8E80E4560DA9"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/X9twxdqy2Izvm8Ln0PXisy8t2Jk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 16:13:11 -0000

Hi Eliot,

  I think I agree with you.
  I also will take advantage of your message and say (for the 2nd or 3rd
time) that IETF should consider the environment/ecosystem/climate when
developing new protocols. In the same way required sections such as:
"IANA Considerations Section" and/or "Security Considerations Section"
exists, one more section called something like: "Environment impact"
should exists. I know this is difficult to measure, however I do have
faith that it will make the authors thinks twice when designing
protocols (battery friendly/consumption)

  My two cents.


Alejandro,




On 7/22/19 6:09 PM, Eliot Lear wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> From time to time we talk about changing our meeting modalities, and we certainly have done so a bit.  Not so much the plenary, face to face meetings.  For the last 28 years or so, we’ve been meeting three times per year (previously it was four!), and we will continue to do so for a while.  But it’s at least possible that we could meet more effectively and maybe even with fewer plenaries.
>
> Many of us travel great distances just to attend a handful of working groups, especially if we are specialized.  And those working groups meet for an hour or two, and then modulo the hallway conversations, were done.  Being perfectly frank about my own motivations, my daughter wants to know why I generate so much CO2, in what is all too fast becoming her generation’s greatest challenge, and our generation’s greatest shame.
>
> Even so, I am not prepared to propose any particular recommendation, but rather find a way to get to that point through a concerted professional effort that is not performed on the ietf mailing list ;-)
>
> And so draft-lear-we-gotta-stop-meeting-like-this asks the LLC *not* to change our meeting structure, but to bring in the right people to study it in consultation with the IESG, and then to come back with some recommendations for the community’s consideration.  There are no timetables in the draft.  That’s because this might take some time.  And yes there are some financial impacts to be considered, not to mention human impact, not just on standards making, but on the valuable work being done at the Hackathon, and in other activities that colocate with us.
>
> Anyway, have a read.  See what you think.  I’ll be mentioning this at a mic comment in the plenary.
>
> Eliot