RE: Energy saving as an IETF goal
<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Fri, 26 July 2019 07:53 UTC
Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB1801202C4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MG6MfjxMwP8z for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:53:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.66.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1CD91202C3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfedar04.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.6]) by opfedar27.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 45w1YF6t1Tz2y2r; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:53:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.101]) by opfedar04.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 45w1YF5w8Bz1xpd; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:53:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::e878:bd0:c89e:5b42]) by OPEXCAUBM6F.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:53:37 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Energy saving as an IETF goal
Thread-Topic: Energy saving as an IETF goal
Thread-Index: AQHVQwD+LYCDogN7c0qk2AMHeWC/Kqbbfo2AgAEA92A=
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 07:53:36 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330312E93B8@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <9DCA912C-A4F7-4AC6-A6B3-7C399FF237CE@cisco.com> <f4459727-da5a-25a8-cec3-625b9bbad846@lounge.org> <33977e0d-6324-7a93-823d-526b3945aeef@sidn.nl> <CAL02cgQ8BK2iOz6QG6ko0w5TC9_WRO4u4OESt1Y7c0RQk7G_Tw@mail.gmail.com> <16051ac6-2d4a-a4a0-5a54-651803fffa08@lounge.org> <CAL02cgQpqYui0EPWoqHSMEmigGif7JOKEZeph2QkbbXSNxQvYg@mail.gmail.com> <867b3eff-b3fd-e1ca-6e39-bb74e9e5e6f4@network-heretics.com> <1dc283fa-633f-fd41-cf41-76ee8eb9f313@gmail.com> <8790D3DD-989F-4941-B60D-E3866D2389F0@piuha.net> <0100016c29d52701-7a6f7668-7e07-4838-97f0-54b5463787b8-000000@email.amazonses.com> <CAMMESszRkEfza4PaEBsEj8aO=MbNXe6LikGEtRd0CZiHTJYouQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESszRkEfza4PaEBsEj8aO=MbNXe6LikGEtRd0CZiHTJYouQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.247]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330312E93B8OPEXCAUBMA2corp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/XN5VxD3ny7htnvB5Bt_-cpmixqs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 07:53:43 -0000
Hi Alvaro, all, Agree. We used to have a problem statement for what we called at that time PANET (Power-Aware NETworking): https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-panet-problem-statement-03 The questions raised in Section 4 of that draft are still interesting ones (including the potential implications on network operations). FWIW, other I-Ds were edited at that time. I can cite for example: * draft-zhang-panet-use-cases: Use Cases for Power-Aware Networks * draft-dong-panet-requirement: Requirements for Power Aware Network * draft-mjsraman-panet-bgp-power-path: Reducing Power Consumption using BGP path selection * draft-mjsraman-panet-intra-as-psp-te-leak: Building power shortest inter-Area TE LSPs using pre-computed paths Some of the documents were already presented in rtgwg and eman wgs. The outcome of these discussion at that time is that this is more a research area. Cheers, Med De : ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Alvaro Retana Envoyé : jeudi 25 juillet 2019 20:02 À : Kent Watsen; Jari Arkko Cc : IETF discussion list Objet : Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal I also think this could be an interesting topic for the IETF. A few years ago we wrote a "Framework and Requirements for Energy Aware Control Planes” [1]. There wasn’t a lot of interest at the time and we intended to publish it somehow, but got busy on other things… [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-retana-rtgwg-eacp Alvaro. On July 25, 2019 at 11:52:35 AM, Kent Watsen (kent+ietf@watsen.net<mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net>) wrote: Along these lines, roughly a decade ago I filed a patent for selective routing to data centers for purposes of power control and environmental impact [1]. While I've left Juniper since, if there were interest, they may be willing to assign the IPR to IETF if asked nicely. That said, this patent somewhat missed the claim. What's really needed is power-based routing in general (not just to data centers), whereby how green the power is matters. Of course, getting routers to accurately testify the greeness of their power source could be difficult... [1] http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=2&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=8,798,071&OS=8,798,071&RS=8,798,071 Kent On Jul 24, 2019, at 2:54 PM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net<mailto:jari.arkko@piuha.net>> wrote: I think it is an interesting topic and very much on topic for us to think about. And a topic where potential savings could be significant. IT is a huge energy consumer (as well as a producer of short-lived gadgets). IT also has the potential to help optimise many non-IT processes, and therefore directly reduce energy consumption and waste. But of course this is also complex topic and not one where only IETF or only standards help. And a topic where continuous improvements in compute and comms are often offset by more high res videos and ever growing software packages (as well as auto-play and zillions of adverts, placed on my screen after way too much ML analysis). I’d be eager to work on this, assuming we can come up with proposals that can have an impact. Jari
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Ted Lemon
- We gotta stop meeting like this Eliot Lear
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Nico Williams
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Rich Kulawiec
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Melinda Shore
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Dan Harkins
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Giovane Moura
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Richard Barnes
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Jared Mauch
- RE: We gotta stop meeting like this Eric Gray
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Keith Moore
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Keith Moore
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Kathleen Moriarty
- RE: We gotta stop meeting like this Eric Gray
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Damm, Benjamin
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Keith Moore
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Eliot Lear
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Alejandro Acosta
- RE: We gotta stop meeting like this Maisonneuve, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Fernando Gont
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Keith Moore
- RE: We gotta stop meeting like this Eric Gray
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Keith Moore
- RE: We gotta stop meeting like this Eric Gray
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Keith Moore
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Mary B
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Melinda Shore
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Dave Crocker
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Stan Kalisch
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Dan Harkins
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Richard Barnes
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Keith Moore
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Brian E Carpenter
- Energy saving as an IETF goal Brian E Carpenter
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Michael Richardson
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Dan Harkins
- Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Nick Hilliard
- Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Bjoern A. Zeeb
- Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Carsten Bormann
- Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal lloyd.wood
- RE: Energy saving as an IETF goal Eric Gray
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Michael Richardson
- RE: We gotta stop meeting like this Eric Gray
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Keith Moore
- Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Ted Lemon
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Christer Holmberg
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Stan Kalisch
- Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Joel Jaeggli
- Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal George Michaelson
- Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Jari Arkko
- Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Alejandro Acosta
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Fernando Gont
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Bob Hinden
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Rich Kulawiec
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Loa Andersson
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Keith Moore
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this George Michaelson
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Rich Kulawiec
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Brian E Carpenter
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Keith Moore
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Donald Eastlake
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Joel Jaeggli
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Julian Reschke
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Brian E Carpenter
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Dave Cridland
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Michael Richardson
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this S. Moonesamy
- Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Kent Watsen
- Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal George Michaelson
- Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Alvaro Retana
- Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Lars Eggert
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Jacob Hoffman-Andrews
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Nico Williams
- baffled Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Toerless Eckert
- RE: Energy saving as an IETF goal mohamed.boucadair
- Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: baffled Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Brian E Carpenter
- Re: baffled Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Keith Moore
- Re: baffled Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Toerless Eckert
- Re: baffled Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Carsten Bormann
- Re: baffled Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Toerless Eckert
- Re: baffled Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Brian E Carpenter
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Eliot Lear
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Ole Jacobsen
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Salz, Rich
- Re: baffled Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Jacob Hoffman-Andrews
- Re: baffled Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Melinda Shore
- Re: baffled Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Michael Richardson
- Re: baffled Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal lloyd.wood
- Re: baffled Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal (mo… John C Klensin
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Rob Sayre
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Rob Sayre
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Ted Lemon
- RE: We gotta stop meeting like this Andrew Alston
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Rob Sayre
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Rob Sayre
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Ted Lemon
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Rob Sayre
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Keith Moore
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Ted Lemon
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Rob Sayre
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Keith Moore
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Keith Moore
- RE: We gotta stop meeting like this Michel Py
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Matthew A. Miller
- Re: baffled Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal (mo… Toerless Eckert
- Re: baffled Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal (mo… Ted Lemon
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Toerless Eckert
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Ted Lemon
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Toerless Eckert
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Ted Lemon
- Re: baffled Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal (mo… George Michaelson
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Stephan Wenger
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Job Snijders
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Saa] We gotta stop meeting like this Alissa Cooper
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Eliot Lear
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Fernando Gont
- Re: We gotta stop meeting like this Fernando Gont
- Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Erik Nygren
- Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Keith Moore
- Re: Energy saving as an IETF goal Benjamin Kaduk