[sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-algorithm-agility-08.txt> (Algorithm Agility Procedure for RPKI.) to Proposed Standard

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Thu, 03 January 2013 18:20 UTC

Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B6E21F8CBE; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 10:20:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yqyZmjw8J98o; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 10:20:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.1.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C9021F8CBB; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 10:20:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp89-089-242.bbn.com ([128.89.89.242]:52601) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1TqpPD-000KWl-E3; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:20:39 -0500
Message-ID: <50E5CBF7.7040603@bbn.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:20:39 -0500
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org, sidr <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-algorithm-agility-08.txt> (Algorithm Agility Procedure for RPKI.) to Proposed Standard
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:19:51 -0800
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:20:45 -0000

The tech report cited in Eric's message is not a critique of the SIDR 
algorithm agility
document that is the subject if this last call. The tech report is a 
critique of the overall
SIDR repository system and object retrieval paradigm, with an emphasis 
on the speed with which
relying parties (principally ISPs) will be able to acquire RPKI data. 
The RPKI repository
system is defined in RFC 6481; the RP object retrieval approach is 
described in RFC 6480.
The tech report includes assumptions about the addition of many 
instances of additional objects
(router certs) to the RPKI repository system, but these assumptions are 
based on I-Ds that are in process in SIDR, and thus may be the more 
appropriate focus of the report, in terms of responses.

The tech report includes no specific criticisms of the algorithm agility 
mechanism described by the I-D in IETF LC, nor does it suggest any 
changes to this doc. An extensive discussion of the tech report took 
place on the SIDR list, in early December. That discussion also did not 
suggest any proposed changes to the algorithm agility doc. Thus the 
authors do not plan to make any changes as a result of this comment 
being posted during IETF LC.

Steve Kent (on behalf of Roque Gagliano and Sean Turner)