IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Review of draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-17

Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> Thu, 16 March 2017 08:08 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5358F126E3A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 01:08:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N8gUgKggoqZL for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 01:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22d.google.com (mail-lf0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BAF3126D74 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 01:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id a6so16703311lfa.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 01:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=8K3gXHd0IkERV3PjaCnw12S+Xhj7djSqSz0g/Qwts3s=; b=vQJqkd8C2w/1Rj4gMUuah2VoZ1J1g3/EeCFLStvGObfCX5YPWu28JzV+y2inszLsEi Uny1/oXQDIaxHPJINe2DvVvbSVFV/GUomnqVTpex9WFgYxUf6C7AyuvqtZcoEowgVZhW sLybNZZMnl60skIvxCkMs491q+wf6xV34osA5LnYfBQhrvL348dXGTKAAiSYZpmxv2CL 1fV6YXAExZGPoEXycIXxot9UUyimKo5Ga0r4SooRxKxoCBaup0tyDOoOkDZwoIYcGDTE YSiA/paqRxD4wHwcrshgBq4uc/3IW/3H874bPqTGQHRGrwLBrm/jdy9jxeWP06xrN6fp 1RxA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=8K3gXHd0IkERV3PjaCnw12S+Xhj7djSqSz0g/Qwts3s=; b=F2GG7HrSZHKUD/fao5MRpboUsinbEq5LVzkhhBNg+ACIWUEhe82HSb/GuKXYotMGeW nBDq/gY2gS2ovSf7+a56MmNsmKRl5x0tUglWx9izW/2iqKRvcYOSakO5iaGMHx3kNT4a gqNKo3Wn4D6oJ6vpUyvNwEFmhOe6e7IKcBPVJe0SIgbeJSDeIIk8D5GBEJNPTUgJv20T Y80xW2PiTZQqHTEVjP6Q6o4MgJqZD3GlJvi1j4xBi+WDKdEW5oNCGj0FKk8xaRFnrv4F AnX03l4iCtl9sLMay4GRtTKRmzOS0YldC86et+TM0CSYzazcVxQ7XYFE+7jzKrgXmXob ZoOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3ewo8LY7csiFQruDxjwXPMePCRFQ1Sa0j05Idv4ZgCYD3jYFzrkOE4yz4+DARg0Q==
X-Received: by 10.25.208.11 with SMTP id h11mr2381264lfg.150.1489651704502; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 01:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:6b0:7:1:e556:a13f:a9f6:aead? ([2001:6b0:7:1:e556:a13f:a9f6:aead]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 3sm759285ljj.16.2017.03.16.01.08.23 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Mar 2017 01:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Review of draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-17
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <148814339074.2901.10793232146724828053.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <391122AA-5077-4208-AD6A-4104BDAAEDA0@piuha.net>
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
Message-ID: <50cf0939-edc9-cb78-2b30-31e8bc757d1f@mnt.se>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:08:15 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <391122AA-5077-4208-AD6A-4104BDAAEDA0@piuha.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vvRVqOxsBNci3bklGLqSMhITnP5K9vJkl"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/YJb-DaGrgpUJylBrSdpvTZUV2fk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:08:28 -0000


On 2017-03-16 01:21, Jari Arkko wrote:
> Thanks for your review, Russ. For what it is worth, I agree with your comment/question about the credentials. It is fine to have different arrangements for different situations, but Russ’s question was really not about that but whether the CA information mentioned earlier is a part of a specific part of the information model (ma-credentials). I think that deserves clarification.
> 
> Jari
> 

This was exactly the point I was also trying to make.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email