Re: Protocol Action: 'Deprecating Anycast Prefix for 6to4 Relay Routers' to Best Current Practice (draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-11.txt)
David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> Mon, 09 March 2015 21:01 UTC
Return-Path: <farmer@umn.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8481A1ACD68 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zQRZqiGgVXg7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:01:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs-w.tc.umn.edu (vs-w.tc.umn.edu [134.84.119.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475971ACD55 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-f182.google.com (mail-ig0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by vs-w.tc.umn.edu (UMN smtpd) with ESMTP for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 16:01:25 -0500 (CDT)
X-Umn-Remote-Mta: [N] mail-ig0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182] #+LO+TS+TR
X-Umn-Classification: local
Received: by igal13 with SMTP id l13so25238929iga.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umn.edu; s=google; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent:mime-version :to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yoL05LaAX9HjygYF4aClMH54Aa3s3yduqd6V8H3jmOQ=; b=UJmhxFZCRGSKcw4LkkPysUbprp1ccaOOzgsyHugpdYcl4PQzqFwaK2ksaIm99Wbnsh YfpQr3ZGTFNqMrsvKY5YvgHsaQM/Nfb2kRSGuimkXw+7A3cJa546wkIQtgQMu3CH6zG6 8QdPfoOrFWEQdw4iTKtklY/lwZj9pphiiwJCg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yoL05LaAX9HjygYF4aClMH54Aa3s3yduqd6V8H3jmOQ=; b=fnlUYQZoGEW5H4GGnl+0uytTdO5sZbOpqM66BOw/SP68yjK6q86RB77DlGxYgo7ixp lYyXbmCDvANKKm2Mmyspai6Q2PAyoLM5gVbGeoRf4yPoePZziXX2w1+8KnRjbkJe+Dp/ MqXNBn/Kmn9Qj5JOxhjJB6iKuGPOAG56dag1eddiQgeBW8A5oHRwUZ7PVtfBurkX3WWw Gj9QhsYVQWqmNbIaFmOISiKNJU1Hwc9ijYi8ml1zvUjYc9pwJHuTLU4IZ8y4SJlgeACk xf4EgkVpznJBVjHINwvWOj76YWuDr/v8o5eP3jpQxqBkbdkuVVNpUdgikzo8Gb2rgSaK ELrw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnZHFws5Sgcr8Oyv9mnIaMJrr3ZGDeGvvXI9E8LInzFbQq3MboVT7mMo22qhCM4MiZLlrrYgVk3Hh66UYxPwhT06IfuVdbTcL6eZIXNhiF1JFQwpVG3e2nH1MllaRnTV09F/k1C
X-Received: by 10.42.66.208 with SMTP id q16mr30035368ici.11.1425934884887; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.42.66.208 with SMTP id q16mr30035328ici.11.1425934884600; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from x-128-101-235-196.uofm-secure.wireless.umn.edu ([2607:ea00:104:2000:687f:9eae:792d:586e]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e3sm364158igg.16.2015.03.09.14.01.19 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:01:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <54FE0A1B.2010009@umn.edu>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 16:01:15 -0500
From: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Organization: University of Minnesota
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Protocol Action: 'Deprecating Anycast Prefix for 6to4 Relay Routers' to Best Current Practice (draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-11.txt)
References: <20150309163330.30198.34988.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150309163330.30198.34988.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/YiJ5-vB26VVt3Hfi8-i8FPPBC2o>
Cc: v6ops mailing list <v6ops@ietf.org>, v6ops chair <v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 21:01:29 -0000
On 3/9/15 11:33 , The IESG wrote: > The IESG has approved the following document: > - 'Deprecating Anycast Prefix for 6to4 Relay Routers' > (draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-11.txt) as Best Current Practice Good News! ... > In response to the IANA review: > > OLD: > > Instead, IANA is requested to mark the 192.88.99.0/24 > prefix originally defined by [RFC3068] as "Deprecated (6to4 Relay > Anycast)", pointing to the present document. > > NEW: > > Instead, IANA is requested to mark the 192.88.99.0/24 > prefix originally defined by [RFC3068] as "Deprecated (6to4 Relay > Anycast)", pointing to the present document. The Boolean values > for the address block 192.88.99.0/24 will all be removed. What is the rationale for removing the Boolean values? Wouldn't the current values apply until the prefix is repurposed or removed by future protocol action? I'm not sure I really care, but I don't understand what is served by removing the current values. I'm not sure what purpose the Boolean values really serve, but the current values seem the most appropriate until the prefix is permanently removed or repurposed. Thanks. -- ================================================ David Farmer Email: farmer@umn.edu Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952 ================================================
- Re: Protocol Action: 'Deprecating Anycast Prefix … David Farmer