Re: Standards-essential patents under RAND licensing
Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Fri, 11 January 2013 01:16 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725F521F8922 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:16:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vYiDvNIOvymG for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:16:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD5F21F8920 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:16:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1318A2016D; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:20:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 7A31663765; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:15:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC50636B6; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:15:44 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: tglassey <tglassey@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Standards-essential patents under RAND licensing
In-Reply-To: <50EF3ADA.3030502@earthlink.net>
References: <201301102122.r0ALMsW44942968@shell01.TheWorld.com> <50EF3ADA.3030502@earthlink.net>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3; nmh 1.3-dev; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 20:15:44 -0500
Message-ID: <25863.1357866944@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 01:16:34 -0000
>>>>> "tglassey" == tglassey <tglassey@earthlink.net> writes: tglassey> What do you do where a patent predates any standards use of the IP. I tglassey> understand the issues of developing IP but what about IP that already existed tglassey> before the standards processes incorporated it into their work product? I think that it depends upon whether the owner of the patent was involved in producing the standard. If not, and nobody knew of the patent, there is certainly a problem. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
- Standards-essential patents under RAND licensing Dale R. Worley
- Re: Standards-essential patents under RAND licens… tglassey
- Re: Standards-essential patents under RAND licens… Michael Richardson
- Re: Standards-essential patents under RAND licens… Eric Burger