Fwd: RFC 5378 representation
Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Fri, 19 December 2008 17:38 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A48C28C0F4; Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:38:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A43A3A6958 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:58:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.013
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.013 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.299, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JrNCMOh6rKzL for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:58:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343D23A63EB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:58:51 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.36,245,1228089600"; d="sig'?scan'208,217";a="124764589"
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Dec 2008 22:58:43 +0000
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (sj-core-3.cisco.com [171.68.223.137]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id mBIMwhO9025514 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:58:43 -0800
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBIMwhUj018441 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:58:43 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:58:43 -0800
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-219.cisco.com ([10.32.244.219]) by xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:58:42 -0800
Message-Id: <5F20691E-AC69-4A06-8F3F-1DEB0E3578AE@cisco.com>
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Fwd: RFC 5378 representation
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:58:42 -0800
References: <9DFF8BF6-6125-4126-9896-EC0D4E59CE8E@cisco.com>
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail d55 (v55, Leopard)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Dec 2008 22:58:42.0816 (UTC) FILETIME=[2C82C000:01C96164]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=29023; t=1229641123; x=1230505123; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Fwd=3A=20RFC=205378=20representation |Sender:=20; bh=/PIm6NzXVVSsGN83nGDesdioDghKjVlH+SuEMYaiEU8=; b=NMfo1Uq/aDJlOM6fXBpkzvmd4pRgyyoBosBe45+r21SIc31VFVeR9pvq2d VVG7ISo70ugR/MDAqXzCwMTBgNe0cH3EcGfR5SsZDd+EI+sH+Fib0vGmyt0Z SBfE3c9Kjt;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=fred@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:38:12 -0800
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1946776926=="
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
For the record, I have sent the following email to the IAD, signed using my PGP key. I would encourage others to send similar notes. > From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> > Date: December 18, 2008 2:56:20 PM PST > To: iad@ietf.org > Cc: Trustees <trustees@ietf.org> > Subject: RFC 5378 representation > > I, Fred Baker, am one of the authors or editors of a variety of RFCs > whose publication pre-dates RFC 5378, noted at the end of this > email. I speak for myself, but not for my co-authors or co-editors > or any current or previous employer. > > I have always understood that work that I did in the community and > contributions that I made to it belonged to the community. In one > case, the community asked me to describe an algorithm that my > employer described in a web page in an internet draft; On that, I > did not seek my employer's release, and so did not authorize > derivative works from that internet draft (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-sava-cisco-ip-source-guard > ). In all other cases, I authorize the IETF to produce works > derivative from my past efforts, and disclaim any rights that would > prevent it from doing so. > RFC 1220 > Point-to-Point Protocol extensions for bridging. F. Baker. April 1 > 1991. (Format: TXT=38165 bytes) (Obsoleted by RFC 1638) (Status: > PROPOSED STANDARD) > RFC 1232 > Definitions of managed objects for the DS1 Interface type. F. Baker, > C.P. Kolb. May 1991. (Format: TXT=60757 bytes) (Obsoleted by RFC > 1406) (Updated by RFC 1239) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD) > RFC 1248 > OSPF Version 2 Management Information Base. F. Baker, R. Coltun. > July 1991. (Format: TXT=74347 bytes) (Obsoleted by RFC 1252) > (Updated by RFC 1349) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD) > RFC 1252 > OSPF Version 2 Management Information Base. F. Baker, R. Coltun. > August 1991. (Format: TXT=74471 bytes) (Obsoletes RFC 1248) > (Obsoleted by RFC 1253) (Also RFC 1247, RFC 1245) (Status: PROPOSED > STANDARD) > RFC 1253 > OSPF Version 2 Management Information Base. F. Baker, R. Coltun. > August 1991. (Format: TXT=74453 bytes) (Obsoletes RFC 1252) > (Obsoleted by RFC 1850) (Also RFC 1247, RFC 1245, RFC 1246) (Status: > PROPOSED STANDARD) > RFC 1315 > Management Information Base for Frame Relay DTEs. C. Brown, F. > Baker, C. Carvalho. April 1992. (Format: TXT=33825 bytes) (Obsoleted > by RFC 2115) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD) > RFC 1354 > IP Forwarding Table MIB. F. Baker. July 1992. (Format: TXT=24905 > bytes) (Obsoleted by RFC 2096) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD) > RFC 1381 > SNMP MIB Extension for X.25 LAPB. D. Throop, F. Baker. November > 1992. (Format: TXT=71253 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD) > RFC 1389 > RIP Version 2 MIB Extensions. G. Malkin, F. Baker. January 1993. > (Format: TXT=23569 bytes) (Obsoleted by RFC 1724) (Status: PROPOSED > STANDARD) > RFC 1406 > Definitions of Managed Objects for the DS1 and E1 Interface Types. > F. Baker, J. Watt, Eds.. January 1993. (Format: TXT=97559 bytes) > (Obsoletes RFC 1232) (Obsoleted by RFC 2495) (Status: PROPOSED > STANDARD) > RFC 1638 > PPP Bridging Control Protocol (BCP). F. Baker, R. Bowen. June 1994. > (Format: TXT=58477 bytes) (Obsoletes RFC 1220) (Obsoleted by RFC > 2878) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD) > RFC 1724 > RIP Version 2 MIB Extension. G. Malkin, F. Baker. November 1994. > (Format: TXT=29645 bytes) (Obsoletes RFC 1389) (Status: DRAFT > STANDARD) > RFC 1749 > IEEE 802.5 Station Source Routing MIB using SMIv2. K. McCloghrie, F. > Baker, E. Decker. December 1994. (Format: TXT=17563 bytes) (Updates > RFC 1748) (Status: HISTORIC) > RFC 1812 > Requirements for IP Version 4 Routers. F. Baker, Ed.. June 1995. > (Format: TXT=415740 bytes) (Obsoletes RFC 1716, RFC 1009) (Updated > by RFC 2644) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD) > RFC 1850 > OSPF Version 2 Management Information Base. F. Baker, R. Coltun. > November 1995. (Format: TXT=140255 bytes) (Obsoletes RFC 1253) > (Obsoleted by RFC 4750) (Status: DRAFT STANDARD) > RFC 2082 > RIP-2 MD5 Authentication. F. Baker, R. Atkinson. January 1997. > (Format: TXT=25436 bytes) (Obsoleted by RFC 4822) (Status: PROPOSED > STANDARD) > RFC 2096 > IP Forwarding Table MIB. F. Baker. January 1997. (Format: TXT=35930 > bytes) (Obsoletes RFC 1354) (Obsoleted by RFC 4292) (Status: > PROPOSED STANDARD) > RFC 2115 > Management Information Base for Frame Relay DTEs Using SMIv2. C. > Brown, F. Baker. September 1997. (Format: TXT=59950 bytes) > (Obsoletes RFC 1315) (Status: DRAFT STANDARD) > RFC 2206 > RSVP Management Information Base using SMIv2. F. Baker, J. Krawczyk, > A. Sastry. September 1997. (Format: TXT=112937 bytes) (Status: > PROPOSED STANDARD) > RFC 2208 > Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) -- Version 1 Applicability > Statement Some Guidelines on Deployment. A. Mankin, Ed., F. Baker, > B. Braden, S. Bradner, M. O`Dell, A. Romanow, A. Weinrib, L. Zhang. > September 1997. (Format: TXT=14289 bytes) (Status: INFORMATIONAL) > RFC 2213 > Integrated Services Management Information Base using SMIv2. F. > Baker, J. Krawczyk, A. Sastry. September 1997. (Format: TXT=36147 > bytes) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD) > RFC 2214 > Integrated Services Management Information Base Guaranteed Service > Extensions using SMIv2. F. Baker, J. Krawczyk, A. Sastry. September > 1997. (Format: TXT=15971 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD) > RFC 2382 > A Framework for Integrated Services and RSVP over ATM. E. Crawley, > Ed., L. Berger, S. Berson, F. Baker, M. Borden, J. Krawczyk. August > 1998. (Format: TXT=73865 bytes) (Status: INFORMATIONAL) > RFC 2474 > Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the > IPv4 and IPv6 Headers. K. Nichols, S. Blake, F. Baker, D. Black. > December 1998. (Format: TXT=50576 bytes) (Obsoletes RFC 1455, RFC > 1349) (Updated by RFC 3168, RFC 3260) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD) > RFC 2597 > Assured Forwarding PHB Group. J. Heinanen, F. Baker, W. Weiss, J. > Wroclawski. June 1999. (Format: TXT=24068 bytes) (Updated by RFC > 3260) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD) > RFC 2747 > RSVP Cryptographic Authentication. F. Baker, B. Lindell, M. Talwar. > January 2000. (Format: TXT=49477 bytes) (Updated by RFC 3097) > (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD) > RFC 2804 > IETF Policy on Wiretapping. IAB, IESG. May 2000. (Format: TXT=18934 > bytes) (Status: INFORMATIONAL) > RFC 2814 > SBM (Subnet Bandwidth Manager): A Protocol for RSVP-based Admission > Control over IEEE 802-style networks. R. Yavatkar, D. Hoffman, Y. > Bernet, F. Baker, M. Speer. May 2000. (Format: TXT=141886 bytes) > (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD) > RFC 2860 > Memorandum of Understanding Concerning the Technical Work of the > Internet Assigned Numbers Authority. B. Carpenter, F. Baker, M. > Roberts. June 2000. (Format: TXT=12361 bytes) (Status: INFORMATIONAL) > RFC 2998 > A Framework for Integrated Services Operation over Diffserv > Networks. Y. Bernet, P. Ford, R. Yavatkar, F. Baker, L. Zhang, M. > Speer, R. Braden, B. Davie, J. Wroclawski, E. Felstaine. November > 2000. (Format: TXT=76378 bytes) (Status: INFORMATIONAL) > RFC 3175 > Aggregation of RSVP for IPv4 and IPv6 Reservations. F. Baker, C. > Iturralde, F. Le Faucheur, B. Davie. September 2001. (Format: > TXT=88681 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD) > RFC 3289 > Management Information Base for the Differentiated Services > Architecture. F. Baker, K. Chan, A. Smith. May 2002. (Format: > TXT=239041 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD) > RFC 3518 > Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Bridging Control Protocol (BCP). M. > Higashiyama, F. Baker, T. Liao. April 2003. (Format: TXT=82102 > bytes) (Obsoletes RFC 2878) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD) > RFC 3704 > Ingress Filtering for Multihomed Networks. F. Baker, P. Savola. > March 2004. (Format: TXT=35942 bytes) (Updates RFC 2827) (Also > BCP0084) (Status: BEST CURRENT PRACTICE) > RFC 3716 > The IETF in the Large: Administration and Execution. IAB Advisory > Committee. March 2004. (Format: TXT=91326 bytes) (Status: > INFORMATIONAL) > RFC 3924 > Cisco Architecture for Lawful Intercept in IP Networks. F. Baker, B. > Foster, C. Sharp. October 2004. (Format: TXT=40826 bytes) (Status: > INFORMATIONAL) > RFC 4053 > Procedures for Handling Liaison Statements to and from the IETF. S. > Trowbridge, S. Bradner, F. Baker. April 2005. (Format: TXT=38816 > bytes) (Also BCP0103) (Status: BEST CURRENT PRACTICE) > RFC 4192 > Procedures for Renumbering an IPv6 Network without a Flag Day. F. > Baker, E. Lear, R. Droms. September 2005. (Format: TXT=52110 bytes) > (Updates RFC 2072) (Status: INFORMATIONAL) > RFC 4542 > Implementing an Emergency Telecommunications Service (ETS) for Real- > Time Services in the Internet Protocol Suite. F. Baker, J. Polk. May > 2006. (Format: TXT=99770 bytes) (Status: INFORMATIONAL) > RFC 4594 > Configuration Guidelines for DiffServ Service Classes. J. Babiarz, > K. Chan, F. Baker. August 2006. (Format: TXT=144044 bytes) (Status: > INFORMATIONAL) > RFC 4750 > OSPF Version 2 Management Information Base. D. Joyal, Ed., P. > Galecki, Ed., S. Giacalone, Ed., R. Coltun, F. Baker. December 2006. > (Format: TXT=222459 bytes) (Obsoletes RFC 1850) (Status: PROPOSED > STANDARD) > RFC 4923 > Quality of Service (QoS) Signaling in a Nested Virtual Private > Network. F. Baker, P. Bose. August 2007. (Format: TXT=92632 bytes) > (Status: INFORMATIONAL) > RFC 5127 > Aggregation of DiffServ Service Classes. K. Chan, J. Babiarz, F. > Baker. February 2008. (Format: TXT=43751 bytes) (Status: > INFORMATIONAL)
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Fwd: RFC 5378 representation Fred Baker
- Re: RFC 5378 representation Fred Baker
- RE: RFC 5378 representation Christian Huitema
- Re: RFC 5378 representation Cullen Jennings
- Re: RFC 5378 representation Fred Baker
- Re: RFC 5378 representation Ray Pelletier
- Re: RFC 5378 representation Cullen Jennings