Re: Request for comments on draft mail protocol

Vernon Schryver <vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com> Wed, 26 May 2004 23:27 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA28143 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 May 2004 19:27:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BT7nj-00077d-Fv for ietf-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 26 May 2004 19:27:11 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BT7mm-00070E-00 for ietf-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 26 May 2004 19:26:13 -0400
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BT7lw-0006pU-00; Wed, 26 May 2004 19:25:20 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BT7bu-0005x6-Q6; Wed, 26 May 2004 19:14:58 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BT7UJ-0003Dy-42 for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 26 May 2004 19:07:07 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA27080 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 May 2004 19:07:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BT7UH-0005FS-Mj for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 26 May 2004 19:07:05 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BT7TP-0005A7-00 for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 26 May 2004 19:06:12 -0400
Received: from calcite.rhyolite.com ([192.188.61.3]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BT7Sc-0004yC-00 for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 26 May 2004 19:05:22 -0400
Received: (from vjs@localhost) by calcite.rhyolite.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) id i4QN4qP7042280 for ietf@ietf.org env-from <vjs>; Wed, 26 May 2004 17:04:52 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 17:04:52 -0600
From: Vernon Schryver <vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com>
Message-Id: <200405262304.i4QN4qP7042280@calcite.rhyolite.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20040526181202.K84741@nyc.rimasec.net>
Subject: Re: Request for comments on draft mail protocol
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60

> From: James Denness 

> I am currently involved in a project to create an internet-draft for a
> domain/key based system allowing mail domains to be validated using rsa
> keys, distributed using the DNS system, with minimal modification to
> existing infrastructure. Does a specification for such a system already
> exist? I have many ideas for extentions to the existing SMTP protocol, as
> well as plans for a derivative protocol incorporating this key-based
> system as a more secure and verifiable method of exchanging mail. If
> anyone is interested, I would appreciate being contacted off-list to
> discuss the possible formation of a working group to discuss such ideas.

what about http://ietf.org/html.charters/marid-charter.html ?

It might be interesting to contact the author of
draft-delany-domainkeys-base-00.txt
or the authors of the at least half a dozen other proposals to use
public keys or other mechanisms along with the domain name system to
authenticate mail senders.


My rather negative view of the area can be inferred from
http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/you-might-be.html


Vernon Schryver    vjs@rhyolite.com

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf