Re: WG Review: Extensible Provisioning Protocol Extensions (eppext)
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 25 November 2013 20:17 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=0034ec80fc=johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7BE51ADF82 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:17:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.793
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.793 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VsTU0ws4bBoH for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:17:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56F21ADF80 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:17:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 13810 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2013 20:17:15 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 25 Nov 2013 20:17:15 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=5293b04b.xn--hew.k1310; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=AgX4LcMB4RWZizsbD8j3HjTvniwrGHsM11WBTpWoZSc=; b=fqaU37tmMGkkxEFGrKBpJIIghWVWRa/0r3TFdTAjEHXlQEuiP8nYW17Y6RhC+4n+RR0+bagtSZaN62QNyz+Dhbbk8SK7MxU7A8BBSqFPTo7atE64CNoE4cJuWdS1k3KwxOvyMA5yNj7i977w72y44xH9BoDK2h4P5ek046yZiwI/SbeWpzha7ntzJ193n0wKAB3aLluRajkuzHgXWzcU3qmr6pE1MiY3yFmIatwn0e4UPKWpiHM9SwqO2NgxPnb0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=5293b04b.xn--hew.k1310; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=AgX4LcMB4RWZizsbD8j3HjTvniwrGHsM11WBTpWoZSc=; b=hXcBC5uIssXrDIUELpNjcivvf+71f3q9frKzz5hmKCJa2UVh0/kdBJS7xoEZulo7cZ2i45LzlRNafTFV6qywjG5RH06e7I9i3ged9hrwtB/09tjmGwppAsD6g+5boCkUr5hneIcD+GtEwRGvPi39KHJwqFqj19QETrxWoQf3D4A5EarqLnS3UCnK9CPiEuEMuYENf8O+uHvOozSZDOyW/AUdQqZjZEZ78dVGwEQSyiVswMBe7ehXjFmsbxUX6KQY
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 20:16:53 -0000
Message-ID: <20131125201653.56513.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: WG Review: Extensible Provisioning Protocol Extensions (eppext)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20131125101125.0cb56368@resistor.net>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Cc: sm@resistor.net
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 20:17:17 -0000
>One the drafts is about the marks in the ICANN Trademark >Clearinghouse. I don't see how that draft fits within the Standards Track. I believe that the draft is intended to describe an EPP extension a registry uses to query the TMCH. Since EPP is on the standards track, that seems reasonable to me. The draft needs a some work to make that clearer, though.