Re: IPv10 is the solution.

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Tue, 01 February 2022 13:22 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437533A0BB3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 05:22:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.612
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.612 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.714, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ht0jwcXTGh2R for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 05:22:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C22763A0BAD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Feb 2022 05:22:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 22539 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2022 13:18:41 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 1 Feb 2022 13:18:41 -0000
Message-ID: <ebc3cd20-1866-0c0c-a0ef-f25df2a09b20@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 22:22:20 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0
Subject: Re: IPv10 is the solution.
Content-Language: en-US
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <AM7PR03MB6594F8D241FD6D663B1CAF39AE269@AM7PR03MB6594.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com> <f04fc618-5c70-d851-42e4-4a2601dd9d16@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <AM7PR03MB6594308AF1D71774E4771A84AE269@AM7PR03MB6594.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com> <f853dda2-9831-8edb-b2d3-b58ca176deab@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <AM7PR03MB659426DEE458F18883023B88AE269@AM7PR03MB6594.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <AM7PR03MB659426DEE458F18883023B88AE269@AM7PR03MB6594.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/a_l1vi3RbFvwM6yr7D9ZaxgJLME>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 13:22:26 -0000

Khaled Omar wrote:

> IPv6 is important,

Not at all.

So, please don't try to make it worse with your added complication
as it is already too much complicated to be useless.

					Masataka Ohta