IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-20.txt

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Fri, 10 February 2017 10:29 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E5F1295B2; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 02:29:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wSJwDVONDotp; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 02:29:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x242.google.com (mail-wr0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC3211294F5; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 02:29:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x242.google.com with SMTP id o16so14684296wra.2; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 02:29:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9QdtTsJ1Fyc2/uzMYpSQv62Aamk/zerXve5ivyTi9+M=; b=NOnvfgu6QIthYXH0+TfEMk4XDR/Y/Gfoq1fQUf4HK9AmQLi7q1M8H7LgRVUl8k438B yz7mQOCtnYRW6Q7zDLiPGqz+8dJ8BtHNzEmRBnt/PTvQVgoiIUZLqALWTfwmN/JCN7v5 HxkqPFxU+NSzJbiJ+85R9C38bcuZJmIEPDnszZdtP7Gl7MFaBJ0A5b8kOPgUJTM6BE8j r0zQJP4Ay5VxYauWKA43OxH1XtM94hl3th8uxLxrSatCyt6iCT014JP6IfN8i4uP8/4/ ABdZb1gFTaRO2EUcS+dSnMxwzE1pG0FLHnslYbOD9s/VQqMVbTfKc5j9pcpEWiZjjcEO LxqQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9QdtTsJ1Fyc2/uzMYpSQv62Aamk/zerXve5ivyTi9+M=; b=cdRAzwnsIzcBNYvinIWZNAi7pjqSGY8YcDMXcL72fN2r/yGGmYH4E/KA6kX721h36i cCuxoWMLOgQW7NvRUN/IQ9gR1doaCk2iqdjgWEir444EnJ/AZ/3cu5leMnhQR/tdgcns mzmeYut4BzpoCqEQVEgUYqlOKp69mihtGX2AmGxgbIiZCN6f6RvNnlOoe7gpZyO7kfWc IyVjawieG+0qMocltjpyqyj2YOvl9K0MN5eAM1BWonzhOvGjwJiJvvxkoNwJe1x6d+Qe flaI8Fkq3yHcC0MLuLQ5P8gipFEn0kigHatF2CbFb/1lEup863fscQbbwIdPBMskG/sr HUdQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mx0IWwCjegJjC+i7naqHties7uQ6yjIlB2Y/fFW9GQm3Yuxup6jn6hUpQj3AHp6w==
X-Received: by 10.223.170.221 with SMTP id i29mr8343751wrc.131.1486722566403; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 02:29:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.126] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b87sm926465wmi.0.2017.02.10.02.29.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Feb 2017 02:29:25 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-20.txt
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <148666276925.548.6888411648092656848.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJKxyF_o8rgoOZNKNFMBiydgvQ0eGTkoZ4bMasLaos5RWw@mail.gmail.com> <da7f618d-440a-96b2-ac18-5617b6268c8f@pi.nu>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <cb30a738-b5d5-b68a-983c-c95c629a9df4@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:29:23 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <da7f618d-440a-96b2-ac18-5617b6268c8f@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/acoK10dkoLnwAQWgFOsMdTtCkuA>
Cc: draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis.all@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:29:29 -0000

Both this document and the early allocation document remain silent
on the reinstatement of expired (dead) early allocations on publication.

If a protocol has taken longer to publish than expected, and the constant
renewal via the IESG has not happened, I think that technically the
result should be a new assignment, when the right thing is often
to support the deployed user base by resurrecting the value and
assigning it to the RFC.

- Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email