Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-mdr-03.txt> (Use of OSPF-MDR in Single-Hop Broadcast Networks) to Experimental RFC
Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Thu, 06 June 2013 10:15 UTC
Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD1B21F92E7; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 03:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.299, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ldBzzB9XIgNQ; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 03:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com (mail-pd0-f179.google.com [209.85.192.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D409721F921F; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 03:15:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f179.google.com with SMTP id q11so3138596pdj.38 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 03:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=UzmbndkKjIU1oQDCy5twj3ynC4pxiNOub82+G4AD95Q=; b=V0L6L4Nzpe9Fy2gAa62M8MvLHdW03qpe2IZ/OldRXDsIhNI96pQsaD7Eev96eLY1ep 2R8UlEDTGa54UaMXBkVJczLtOLd4SM5Qd3pBYaCa37CULi09cKfCVh+GJdn8NYpLuIIk Xd/ZfzoJGorDHRySZOWu5RGM9rmU38qjgMfoF8GwOAaOkglfNGaVUQMgVrmPnu4Wlubw BxXhcpDeNPOzTsFn1FFaE7kDWyG0D/mSvzikI3gE9iU9sFKW+88MPMISYDPCr6CThugH oUgf4Ug9QXFqw/mtUtQv91tgyjnQjZ1oTGUFcccEN7nr8FGjoky1INZ0pSSWZqIBQTpf 4eNw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.176.197 with SMTP id ck5mr36797529pbc.165.1370513720720; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 03:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.78.164 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 03:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130605150955.25672.65454.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20130605150955.25672.65454.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 12:15:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8-JoLv4drWwx1DmU9Bgeo1ts7_h=WtNUwripmTYB3EZ9w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-mdr-03.txt> (Use of OSPF-MDR in Single-Hop Broadcast Networks) to Experimental RFC
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-mdr@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-mdr@tools.ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 10:15:28 -0000
I send my request to the editors including questions but no reply from them to me. The thread [1] raised some issues, which is not mentioned in the I-D. The message [2] was ignored not answered (this is last reminder). The message [3] proposes using RFC5444 into this I-D, or raise the question of why not using MANET packet format within MANET domains (I need an answer). [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/current/msg15400.html [2] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/current/msg15412.html [3] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/current/msg15418.html The I-D SHOULD not go forward if it still ignores the IETF community questions. Regards AB On 6/5/13, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote: > > The IESG has received a request from the Open Shortest Path First IGP WG > (ospf) to consider the following document: > - 'Use of OSPF-MDR in Single-Hop Broadcast Networks' > <draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-mdr-03.txt> as Experimental RFC > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-06-19. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > RFC 5614 (OSPF-MDR) extends OSPF to support mobile ad hoc networks > (MANETs) by specifying its operation on the new OSPF interface of type > MANET. This document describes the use of OSPF-MDR in a single-hop > broadcast network, which is a special case of a MANET in which each > router is a (one-hop) neighbor of each other router. Unlike an OSPF > broadcast interface, such an interface can have a different cost > associated with each neighbor. The document includes configuration > recommendations and simplified mechanisms that can be used in single-hop > broadcast networks. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-mdr/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-mdr/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > >
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-… joel jaeggli
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-… Richard Ogier
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-… Stewart Bryant
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-… Richard Ogier