Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-mdr-03.txt> (Use of OSPF-MDR in Single-Hop Broadcast Networks) to Experimental RFC

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Thu, 06 June 2013 10:15 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD1B21F92E7; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 03:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.299, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ldBzzB9XIgNQ; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 03:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com (mail-pd0-f179.google.com [209.85.192.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D409721F921F; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 03:15:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f179.google.com with SMTP id q11so3138596pdj.38 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 03:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=UzmbndkKjIU1oQDCy5twj3ynC4pxiNOub82+G4AD95Q=; b=V0L6L4Nzpe9Fy2gAa62M8MvLHdW03qpe2IZ/OldRXDsIhNI96pQsaD7Eev96eLY1ep 2R8UlEDTGa54UaMXBkVJczLtOLd4SM5Qd3pBYaCa37CULi09cKfCVh+GJdn8NYpLuIIk Xd/ZfzoJGorDHRySZOWu5RGM9rmU38qjgMfoF8GwOAaOkglfNGaVUQMgVrmPnu4Wlubw BxXhcpDeNPOzTsFn1FFaE7kDWyG0D/mSvzikI3gE9iU9sFKW+88MPMISYDPCr6CThugH oUgf4Ug9QXFqw/mtUtQv91tgyjnQjZ1oTGUFcccEN7nr8FGjoky1INZ0pSSWZqIBQTpf 4eNw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.176.197 with SMTP id ck5mr36797529pbc.165.1370513720720; Thu, 06 Jun 2013 03:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.78.164 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 03:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130605150955.25672.65454.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20130605150955.25672.65454.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 12:15:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8-JoLv4drWwx1DmU9Bgeo1ts7_h=WtNUwripmTYB3EZ9w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-mdr-03.txt> (Use of OSPF-MDR in Single-Hop Broadcast Networks) to Experimental RFC
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-mdr@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-mdr@tools.ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 10:15:28 -0000

I send my request to the editors including questions but no reply from
them to me. The thread [1] raised some issues, which is not mentioned
in the I-D. The message [2] was ignored not answered (this is last
reminder). The message [3] proposes using RFC5444 into this I-D, or
raise the question of why not using MANET packet format within MANET
domains (I need an answer).

[1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/current/msg15400.html
[2] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/current/msg15412.html
[3] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/current/msg15418.html

The I-D SHOULD not go forward if it still ignores the IETF community questions.

Regards
AB

On 6/5/13, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> The IESG has received a request from the Open Shortest Path First IGP WG
> (ospf) to consider the following document:
> - 'Use of OSPF-MDR in Single-Hop Broadcast Networks'
>   <draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-mdr-03.txt> as Experimental RFC
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-06-19. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
> RFC 5614 (OSPF-MDR) extends OSPF to support mobile ad hoc networks
> (MANETs) by specifying its operation on the new OSPF interface of type
> MANET.  This document describes the use of OSPF-MDR in a single-hop
> broadcast network, which is a special case of a MANET in which each
> router is a (one-hop) neighbor of each other router.  Unlike an OSPF
> broadcast interface, such an interface can have a different cost
> associated with each neighbor.  The document includes configuration
> recommendations and simplified mechanisms that can be used in single-hop
> broadcast networks.
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-mdr/
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-mdr/ballot/
>
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>
>
>