Re: Result of Consultation on ART/TSV Area Reorganization

[S Moonesamy <[e-mail]>]

Hi Keith,
At 09:28 AM 29-09-2023, Keith Moore wrote:
>On 9/29/23 12:07, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
>>The question is "will this end up with a more balanced AD
>>workload that reduces publication time of documents".
>
>I don't think that should be anywhere nearly the only question. For 
>example, the quality and relevance of the documents that IETF 
>produces should be at least as much of a concern.    As should the 
>state of the Internet.

There is an expired draft from 2013 {1] about the potential issues 
facing the IETF.  It takes some work to attempt to solve those 
potential issues.  In my short experience, such work cannot be done 
without people.  In my opinion, telling those people that their 
workload is not a problem is far from persuasive.

There is a message which an AD which was posted in 2022. [2]  It's 
not the first time that there is a succession issue in the Transport Area.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

1. draft-arkko-iesg-crossarea-03
2. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-area/ZnmpPnahMopFRpJ_vsGjo8yBggA/