Re: Last Call: LDP DoD Graceful Restart to Draft Standard
"Adrian Farrel" <afarrel@movaz.com> Wed, 18 June 2003 19:47 UTC
Received: from asgard.ietf.org (asgard.ietf.org [10.27.6.40]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA25653 for <ietf-web-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 15:47:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordomo by asgard.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.14) id 19SiZ4-00005f-4X for ietf-list@asgard.ietf.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 15:25:50 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([10.27.2.28]) by asgard.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19Si7s-0007AW-Bz for ietf@asgard.ietf.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 14:57:44 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA21713; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 14:57:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Si5b-0000Jw-00; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 14:55:23 -0400
Received: from webmail.movaz.com ([65.205.166.188] helo=jera.movaz.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Si5Y-0000HB-00; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 14:55:22 -0400
Received: from BLIULAPTOP (unknown [172.16.24.104]) by jera.movaz.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D5EB517D2; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 14:56:51 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <0aa001c335cb$610e5bb0$681810ac@movaz.com>
From: Adrian Farrel <afarrel@movaz.com>
To: iesg@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Cc: mpls@UU.NET
References: <E19Qspn-0000Rd-3H@asgard.ietf.org> <07b701c331f1$ffeeb820$681810ac@movaz.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: LDP DoD Graceful Restart to Draft Standard
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 14:56:51 -0400
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Did anyone decide there was an error here, or is this draft really in IETF last call? Thanks Adrian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrian Farrel" <afarrel@movaz.com> To: <iesg@ietf.org>; <ietf@ietf.org> Cc: <mpls@UU.NET> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 5:23 PM Subject: Re: Last Call: LDP DoD Graceful Restart to Draft Standard > With respect, this draft doesn't appear to have been through WG last call > (unless I was sleeping, but I can't find any reference in the mail archive). > > It was only published as a WG draft on 5/7/2003 (despite carrying a date of > February 2003). > > While I support the draft, I would like to see it discussed on the mailing list > and go through WG last call. > > Thanks, > Adrian > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "The IESG" <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> > To: <IETF-Announce: ;> > Cc: <mpls@UU.NET> > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:59 PM > Subject: Last Call: LDP DoD Graceful Restart to Draft Standard > > > > --------------- > > The IESG has received a request from Multiprotocol Label Switching to > > consider the following Internet-Draft(s) as Draft Standard. > > o Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS): LDP DoD Graceful Restart > > <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod-restart-00.txt> > > Draft Standard > > > > > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > > final comments on this action. Please send any comments to the > > iesg@ietf.org or ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by . > > > > Files can be obtained via > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod-restart-00.txt > > > >
- Re: Last Call: LDP DoD Graceful Restart to Draft … Adrian Farrel
- Re: Last Call: LDP DoD Graceful Restart to Draft … Adrian Farrel
- Re: Last Call: LDP DoD Graceful Restart to Draft … Alex Zinin