Re: what is expected from whom.

Frank Kastenholz <kasten@ftp.com> Tue, 05 January 1993 19:59 UTC

Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08477; 5 Jan 93 14:59 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14621; 5 Jan 93 14:59 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08469; 5 Jan 93 14:59 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08463; 5 Jan 93 14:59 EST
Received: from venera.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14615; 5 Jan 93 14:59 EST
Received: from ftp.com (babyoil.ftp.com) by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.65+local-7) id <AA20786>; Tue, 5 Jan 1993 12:02:04 -0800
Received: by ftp.com id AA27684; Tue, 5 Jan 93 14:59:51 -0500
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 14:59:51 -0500
Message-Id: <9301051959.AA27684@ftp.com>
To: sra@epilogue.com
Subject: Re: what is expected from whom.
Sender: ietf-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Frank Kastenholz <kasten@ftp.com>
Reply-To: kasten@ftp.com
Cc: stev@ftp.com, ietf@isi.edu

 > Ok, I'll take a shot.  I don't want a decision made on IPv7 because I
 > think Noel's fundamental observation is right: the wall we're about to
 > hit is a routing architecture problem, not a packet format problem [*].

see section 5.1.1 of draft-partridge-ipv7-criteria-01.txt in your favorite
internet-drafts repository

--
Frank Kastenholz