Re: Turn HotRFCs into Bumps at Virtual IETFs?

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Tue, 28 July 2020 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731223A0A83 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AZDoyP_z6fhW for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 003393A0A64 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 06SHjfu0026411 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 13:45:43 -0400
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:45:40 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Turn HotRFCs into Bumps at Virtual IETFs?
Message-ID: <20200728174540.GS41010@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <CAMm+LwgSx7uqwgieu41szRYiVtmoOeDRESXPrG9fg+VU_+_QBQ@mail.gmail.com> <19445.1595956189@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <19445.1595956189@localhost>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/dd2ye1Je0bJaf8VJGr7B_HNjtoc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:45:55 -0000

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 01:09:49PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 
> Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> wrote:
>     > The HOPE conference is also on this week. Which means I can attend both...
> 
>     > One feature they have is 'bumps' which are short videos that they show in
>     > the intervals between talks. And while I was watching them, it occurred to
>     > me that this is what we should do with HotRFC talks - in the virtual format
>     > at least.
> 
>     > Maybe we should do HOTRFC in video somehow for in-person as well.
> 
> +1
> ideally, mediated via gather.town, so that people in the vicinity of each
> other can babble about it.
> I think that it can embed youtube links.

It can definitely embed video links of some form; see the "10 things about
the IETF" in the newcomers' area.

-Ben