IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-arkko-trip-registry-update-00

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Mon, 03 December 2018 18:05 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B93130F78; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 10:05:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.959
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.959 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-1.459, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G7X0yWf6Uqxa; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 10:05:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A06F130F20; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 10:05:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4710; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1543860309; x=1545069909; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=EqZ1BoFHAndjzwsUToW0lrWu70NiyrCr46gLa6O0+7w=; b=FkNJecHNSb5SXuSAFw16fT09ke+F7k8Nmi/szoy/exkwBXQKPnJD/PuD cC0S+3GJyEXoxEY+JNCPZaH57LJS7CdmstZRwqIzG/d4s+7GdQOYQGI0K 1L+tMQTn5LJdk82Txr+AkTk1+bZ7wg7iYkiP1YeazMSlFE+LRytcXLwMQ M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ADAADjbwVc/5JdJa1jGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUQQBAQEBAQsBgQ12gWgnCoNviBiMDIFokheFVoF6CwEBhGwCF4MwIjQJDQEDAQECAQECbSiFPQYjVhACAQgEOwMCAgIwFBECBA4FgyGBHmSmJ4EviiSMHBeBQD+BOAwTgkyFAIMFMYImAo8WkFpQCQKROhiBW49LigeLY4JcAhEUgScfOIFVcBVlAYJBPpAdQTGKP4EfAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,311,1539648000"; d="scan'208,217";a="480465899"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Dec 2018 18:05:08 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-016.cisco.com (xch-rtp-016.cisco.com [64.101.220.156]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wB3I570Y003954 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 3 Dec 2018 18:05:08 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-016.cisco.com (64.101.220.156) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 13:05:06 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 13:05:07 -0500
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
CC: "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-arkko-trip-registry-update.all@ietf.org" <draft-arkko-trip-registry-update.all@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-arkko-trip-registry-update-00
Thread-Topic: Opsdir last call review of draft-arkko-trip-registry-update-00
Thread-Index: AQHUizKW9U5UfbtWw0GuHEJjaJmrHKVtot6A
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 18:05:07 +0000
Message-ID: <1DFBFF5B-7979-4A91-966C-012A9C765319@cisco.com>
References: <154385988812.4946.9954294611401947565@ietfa.amsl.com> <C9B01DE8-4B07-4CA5-AE5E-027BE5DD4045@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <C9B01DE8-4B07-4CA5-AE5E-027BE5DD4045@piuha.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.101.1)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.116.133]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1DFBFF5B79794A91966C012A9C765319ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.156, xch-rtp-016.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/e7tcuVAzB93Y14rWqP2OTCtM1wA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 18:05:16 -0000

Sounds great, Jari. Thank you for considering the comment!

Thanks,

— Carlos Pignataro

On Dec 3, 2018, at 1:03 PM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net<mailto:jari.arkko@piuha.net>> wrote:

Thanks for your review, Carlos!

I believe this is one issue that should be queued up (also) more generally when we look at RFC8216 revision; the advice there might need to evolve. However, that does not take away the need to make a specific fix to this specific registry.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email