Re: WG Review: Congestion and Pre-Congestion Notification (pcn)
Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Mon, 19 February 2007 16:27 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HJBMc-0001dF-CD; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:27:42 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HJBMa-0001av-Q5; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:27:40 -0500
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HJBMY-0000U6-CV; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:27:40 -0500
Received: from sj-dkim-6.cisco.com ([171.68.10.81]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2007 08:27:39 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.14,191,1170662400"; d="scan'208"; a="390711912:sNHT50101820"
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (sj-core-3.cisco.com [171.68.223.137]) by sj-dkim-6.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l1JGRbgS001755; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 08:27:37 -0800
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l1JGRUhw022808; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 08:27:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 19 Feb 2007 08:27:32 -0800
Received: from [10.32.244.220] ([10.32.244.220]) by xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 19 Feb 2007 08:27:31 -0800
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702191509450.2014@netcore.fi>
References: <E1HH7PO-0007pM-7J@stiedprstage1.ietf.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702191509450.2014@netcore.fi>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <D749CE01-A5F4-4087-AE51-4A9ADC0594E1@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 08:27:30 -0800
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Feb 2007 16:27:31.0719 (UTC) FILETIME=[DAB49170:01C75442]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=2884; t=1171902457; x=1172766457; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim6002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20WG=20Review=3A=20Congestion=20and=20Pre-Congestion=20 Notification=20(pcn)=20 |Sender:=20; bh=b7Q4Vm9uQtKzMYBZn3wLiDyNSIQ75ZR8mA1QeDaYx3k=; b=bASp9s/T1/7mCYyfgdVPxqlhg0bZ8wlc+DD7R7JlqHnXzrzKiMpG0KK1wIbp3ZGWeUfW88Ig GYVYBBZ3DK6x9Igp1PX/NACvpV7yAmzKdrNlTSsl4bfUIdhzWz5bi5ci;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-6; header.From=fred@cisco.com; dkim=pass (si g from cisco.com/sjdkim6002 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: f607d15ccc2bc4eaf3ade8ffa8af02a0
Cc: pcn@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: WG Review: Congestion and Pre-Congestion Notification (pcn)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
On Feb 19, 2007, at 5:19 AM, Pekka Savola wrote: > I'd like to see it explicitly stated that transporting congestion > information in the (metered) IP packets themselves is out of scope. > This should exclude designs such as adding IP options en-route, > defining new extension headers, or modifying the packets in any, > currently undefined way. (I say this explicitly because based on a > very quick look at the mailing list archives I saw discussion > relating to IP header encoding and it unnerved me.) I dunno, I think that horse is out of the barn. In the TCP arena, the XCP and RCP proposals and RFC 3168 could each be described in those terms, and the pre-congestion notification proposals on the table all encode congestion information in the IP packets, mostly in the ECN field. I'll agree that they should not attempt to insert things into the packet (add an option), but using space already set aside in the packet needs to be on the table. I would like to see some crossover between the TCP/SCTP congestion control proposals and the real-time pre-congestion proposals. That's not a matter of declaring something out of scope as much as it is to encourage thoughtful (and not knee-jerk) consideration of whether and how the two types of needs can be met. The drafts I know to be relevant (you'll note that some are in pwe) are: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-babiarz-pcn-sip-cap "SIP Controlled Admission and Preemption", Jozef Babiarz, 16-Oct-06, <draft-babiarz-pcn-sip-cap-00.txt> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-briscoe-tsvwg-cl-architecture "An edge-to-edge Deployment Model for Pre-Congestion Notification: Admission Control over a DiffServ Region", Bob Briscoe, 25-Oct-06, <draft-briscoe-tsvwg-cl-architecture-04.txt> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-briscoe-tsvwg-cl-phb "Pre-Congestion Notification marking", Bob Briscoe, 22-Oct-06, <draft-briscoe-tsvwg-cl-phb-03.txt> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-briscoe-tsvwg-re-ecn-tcp "Re-ECN: Adding Accountability for Causing Congestion to TCP/IP", Bob Briscoe, 26-Oct-06, <draft-briscoe-tsvwg-re-ecn-tcp-03.txt> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chan-pcn-problem-statement "Pre-Congestion Notification Problem Statement", Kwok Ho Chan, 25- Oct-06, <draft-chan-pcn-problem-statement-01.txt> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-davie-ecn-mpls "Explicit Congestion Marking in MPLS", Bruce Davie, 19-Oct-06, <draft-davie-ecn-mpls-01.txt> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pwe3-congestion-frmwk "Pseudowire Congestion Control Framework", Stewart Bryant, 2-Feb-07, <draft-ietf-pwe3-congestion-frmwk-00.txt> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rosen-pwe3-congestion "Pseudowire Congestion Control Framework", Eric Rosen, 19-Oct-06, <draft-rosen-pwe3-congestion-04.txt> _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Re: WG Review: Congestion and Pre-Congestion Noti… Fred Baker
- Re: WG Review: Congestion and Pre-Congestion Noti… Pekka Savola
- RE: [PCN] Re: WG Review: Congestion and Pre-Conge… Pekka Savola
- Re: [PCN] Re: WG Review: Congestion and Pre-Conge… Fred Baker
- Re: [PCN] Re: WG Review: Congestion and Pre-Conge… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [PCN] Re: WG Review: Congestion and Pre-Conge… Fred Baker
- Re: [PCN] Re: WG Review: Congestion and Pre-Conge… Lars Eggert
- Re: [PCN] Re: WG Review: Congestion and Pre-Conge… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: [PCN] Re: WG Review: Congestion and Pre-Conge… Georgios Karagiannis
- RE: [PCN] Re: WG Review: Congestion and Pre-Conge… Georgios Karagiannis
- RE: [PCN] Re: WG Review: Congestion and Pre-Conge… Black_David