draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request
The IESG <iesg@ietf.org> Fri, 24 February 2012 16:07 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D1B21F889C; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 08:07:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OplBWFtBexGj; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 08:07:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2533F21F8898; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 08:07:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21EEC12C8A0; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 08:07:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0mjAAglm8UeJ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 08:07:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.104] (pool-96-241-165-215.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.241.165.215]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC21012C89F; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 08:07:10 -0800 (PST)
From: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 11:07:09 -0500
Message-Id: <B0D4AC4D-4F13-4EBF-A932-21C6F2798D6C@ietf.org>
To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:07:11 -0000
Colleagues, The IESG has observed very rough consensus in favor of the allocation proposed in draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request. Therefore, the IESG will approve the draft. In order to acknowledge dissenting opinions and clarify the IETF position regarding IPv6, the IESG will attach the following note: "A number of operators have expressed a need for the special purpose IPv4 address allocation described by this document. During deliberations, the IETF community demonstrated very rough consensus in favor of the allocation. While operational expedients, including the special purpose address allocation described in this document, may help solve a short-term operational problem, the IESG and the IETF remain committed to the deployment of IPv6." Regards, The IESG