RE: ISOC to cover potential re-structuring costs related to IASA 2.0

"MH Michael Hammer (5304)" <MHammer@ag.com> Tue, 05 September 2017 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <MHammer@ag.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17FB4132C2A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 06:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, LOTS_OF_MONEY=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Uc9TIjbaoG9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 06:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from agwhqht.amgreetings.com (agwhqht.amgreetings.com [207.58.192.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DCEC13243E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 06:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com ([fe80::f5de:4c30:bc26:d70a]) by USCLES532.agna.amgreetings.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 09:54:35 -0400
From: "MH Michael Hammer (5304)" <MHammer@ag.com>
To: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
CC: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
Subject: RE: ISOC to cover potential re-structuring costs related to IASA 2.0
Thread-Topic: ISOC to cover potential re-structuring costs related to IASA 2.0
Thread-Index: AQHTJk0orLMVh6p71USNFwvpGaAo9KKmT9lQ
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 13:54:34 +0000
Message-ID: <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B0537209277@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com>
References: <8fb0dd64-d82e-0d89-8cba-0332e6cdfb28@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <8fb0dd64-d82e-0d89-8cba-0332e6cdfb28@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.144.6.198]
x-kse-attachmentfiltering-interceptor-info: protection disabled
x-kse-serverinfo: USCLES532.agna.amgreetings.com, 9
x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful
x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean, bases: 9/5/2017 12:09:00 PM
x-kse-dlp-scaninfo: Skipped
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/f8-mM5C2t53ulbFf6TI9ZDVvtTc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 13:54:38 -0000

Just because there may be some on the list, who like me, were already not familiar with IASA 2.0, here is a PDF of a summary presentation from June that I found:

https://www.internetsociety.org/sites/default/files/13%20IASA%202.0%20-%20ISOC%20Board.pdf

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gonzalo Camarillo
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2017 9:45 AM
> To: ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: ISOC to cover potential re-structuring costs related to IASA 2.0
> 
> Hi,
> 
> as you know, the ISOC board of trustees is following the IASA 2.0 work with
> interest. From the discussions so far, it is clear that some of the options being
> analyzed by the IETF community would involve re-structuring costs.
> 
> We believe it is important that the IETF community can choose the best
> option for the IASA 2.0 structure and related processes based on its
> *long-term* benefits. The initial and short-term re-structuring costs
> associated to the different options, while important, should not
> unreasonably limit the options to be considered by the community. To that
> effect, the ISOC board of trustees has allocated 1 million USD to cover
> potential re-structuring costs related to the IASA 2.0 process.
> 
> You can think of this as a budget that will be available in case the IASA 2.0
> option chosen by the community requires it. Also, at the risk of stating the
> obvious, if the chosen option does not involve any re-structuring costs, that
> would be perfectly OK as well.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Gonzalo
> Chair - ISOC Board of Trustees