Call for Comments: draft-livingood-web-notification-01

Jason Livingood <jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com> Fri, 12 February 2010 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EEEA28C1A2 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:37:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.066
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.066 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iAeutqxy6+Ix for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:37:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pacdcimo01.cable.comcast.com (PacdcIMO01.cable.comcast.com [24.40.8.145]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0243A78CB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:37:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([10.52.116.31]) by pacdcimo01.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP id 5503620.72226158; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:38:57 -0500
Received: from PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com ([24.40.15.86]) by PAOAKEXCSMTP02.cable.comcast.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:38:50 -0500
Received: from 10.36.138.32 ([10.36.138.32]) by PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com ([24.40.15.86]) via Exchange Front-End Server webmail.comcast.com ([24.40.8.154]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:38:50 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.23.0.091001
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:38:46 -0500
Subject: Call for Comments: draft-livingood-web-notification-01
From: Jason Livingood <jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com>
To: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C79AE036.1C01A%jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com>
Thread-Topic: Call for Comments: draft-livingood-web-notification-01
Thread-Index: AcqrU3EAKTKiTOM3qkyyU6sEvGkqOgApgWxd
In-Reply-To: <C799C9AC.1BF0E%jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3348815926_403969"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Feb 2010 15:38:50.0860 (UTC) FILETIME=[79969AC0:01CAABF9]
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:37:45 -0000

This is a call for comments on an individual draft regarding providing
near-real-time web notifications*.  I and my co-authors would like feedback
on the latest revision of this draft at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-livingood-web-notification-01.

If you have any comments, please send them to me privately for
consideration.

Thank you,
Jason

* This is related to
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-oreirdan-mody-bot-remediation-06.
Basically, when we determine a user is infected with a malicious bot, we are
trying to notify them rapidly, and the notification is described in this
draft.