Protocol Action: SMTP Service Extensions to Standard
The IESG <iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US> Mon, 30 October 1995 14:16 UTC
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09718; 30 Oct 95 9:16 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09043; 30 Oct 95 9:16 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09705; 30 Oct 95 9:16 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09628; 30 Oct 95 9:12 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08923; 30 Oct 95 9:12 EST
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09607; 30 Oct 95 9:12 EST
To: IETF-Announce:;
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@isi.edu>
Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@isi.edu>
Cc: ietf-smtp@list.cren.net
Sender: ietf-announce-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Subject: Protocol Action: SMTP Service Extensions to Standard
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 1995 09:12:08 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Message-ID: <9510300912.aa09607@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
The IESG has approved the following three Internet-Drafts: 1. SMTP Service Extensions <draft-ietf-smtpext-extensions-05.txt> 2. SMTP Service Extension for Message Size Declaration <draft-ietf-smtpext-size-02.txt> for publication with the status of Standard. These documents are the product of the Internet Mail Extensions Working Group. The IESG contact persons are John Klensin and Harald Alvestrand. Technical Summary The protocols form a framework for negotiating use of extended capabilities on an SMTP connection, and one particularly simple use of that mechanism, namely size declaration for messages. Working Group Summary The WG reached consensus at Proposed, and no opposition has been raised after the WG's closure. Protocol Quality There are multiple, interworking implementations, including PMDF, Sendmail 8.7 and SMail (patches). One area of concern, compatibility with non-RFC-821 compliant mail servers, has led to some differences in implementation of the initial EHLO exchange; experience from those who use EHLO aggressively indicates that the defensive strategy coded by some is not required in practice. The protocol was reviewed for the IESG by Harald T. Alvestrand