Re: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-authres-spf-erratum-01.txt> (Authentication-Results Registration Update for SPF Results) to Proposed Standard

SM <sm@resistor.net> Sat, 07 January 2012 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D9621F84F1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 08:11:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.583
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.583 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.016, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LsA67CDK97GK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 08:11:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C81121F84EF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 08:11:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q07GBZYG028184 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 08:11:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1325952703; i=@resistor.net; bh=KHwMXDc0wE3mIJUdSXj+0kwyzFecv7QR79nEPKPextE=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=bbFwKfAY2Virwy8Kwi7dyQ0dP0SWxW5ONDHYHIUeDFuU7pO5J9tET3A0WLA/9h0gk A1wsFvUtQWr96dUmCK6Bx9ECz9puhWTeHPcj5yAiWQ5SZEZI8GfQFIHeA0bzzdxG5I SozfmZe9yo6r/E8XsDn8I5kpUra2KQ4LrBZb4xKg=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120107071336.0a5b7df0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 07:41:52 -0800
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-authres-spf-erratum-01.txt> (Authentication-Results Registration Update for SPF Results) to Proposed Standard
In-Reply-To: <20120106212239.31169.16750.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20120106212239.31169.16750.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 16:11:54 -0000

At 13:22 06-01-2012, The IESG wrote:
>The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
>the following document:
>- 'Authentication-Results Registration Update for SPF Results'
>   <draft-kucherawy-authres-spf-erratum-01.txt> as a Proposed Standard

Summary: I support the publication of this draft.

As a editorial nit, the Introduction Section mentions that the memo 
updates the IANA registries.  Erratum # 2617 is also about Section 
2.4.2.  I suggest changing the heading of Section 3 to "Update to 
Section 2.4.2 of RFC 5451" and some rewording of the paragraph:

  The "hardfail" result value for [SPF] (and thus also for [SENDER-ID])
  in Section 2.4.2 of RFC 5451 is replaced with the "fail" result value.

    fail: This client is explicitly not authorized to inject or relay
          mail using the sender's DNS domain.

Note that the update affects the example in Appendix B.5.

Regards,
-sm