Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-spec-base (Basic Specification for IP ...

HeinerHummel@aol.com Wed, 30 April 2008 15:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A4628C3DF; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:16:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C76B3A6AFB; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 03:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id geccv9CUY0Ip; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 03:11:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imo-m25.mx.aol.com (imo-m25.mx.aol.com [64.12.137.6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B918C28C1BB; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 03:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from HeinerHummel@aol.com by imo-m25.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.3.) id l.c23.36a7df5f (14467); Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:10:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
Message-ID: <c23.36a7df5f.35499fb2@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:10:58 -0400
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-spec-base (Basic Specification for IP ...
To: ietf@ietf.org, ietf-announce@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5017
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:16:56 -0700
Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1784479775=="
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

 
Question: Is the accomplishment of this document considered to be the end  or 
rather the beginning of activities on the rerouting topic ?
 
Heiner
 
In einer eMail vom 29.04.2008 22:35:53 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt  
iesg-secretary@ietf.org:

The IESG  has received a request from the Routing Area Working Group WG 
(rtgwg) to  consider the following document:

- 'Basic Specification for IP  Fast-Reroute: Loop-free Alternates '
<draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-spec-base-12.txt> as a Proposed  Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and  solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send substantive  comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2008-05-13. Exceptionally,  
comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please  
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated  sorting.

The file can be obtained  via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-spec-base-12.txt


IESG  discussion can be tracked  via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=12272&
rfc_flag=0

_______________________________________________
rtgwg  mailing  list
rtgwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg







   
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf