RE: Last call debate on draft-farrell-perpass-attack
<l.wood@surrey.ac.uk> Wed, 08 January 2014 04:32 UTC
Return-Path: <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025951AE2BE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 20:32:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4S3KSxMtP5EJ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 20:32:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.bemta3.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta3.messagelabs.com [195.245.230.162]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700B61AE2BA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 20:32:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [195.245.230.131:15664] by server-2.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 07/CA-17329-9D4DCC25; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 04:32:25 +0000
X-Env-Sender: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk
X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-78.messagelabs.com!1389155544!22096893!1
X-Originating-IP: [131.227.200.31]
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 6.9.16; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 30718 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2014 04:32:25 -0000
Received: from exht011p.surrey.ac.uk (HELO EXHT011P.surrey.ac.uk) (131.227.200.31) by server-2.tower-78.messagelabs.com with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 8 Jan 2014 04:32:25 -0000
Received: from EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk ([169.254.1.204]) by EXHT011P.surrey.ac.uk ([131.227.200.31]) with mapi; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 04:32:24 +0000
From: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk
To: jari.arkko@piuha.net, adrian@olddog.co.uk
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 04:31:35 +0000
Subject: RE: Last call debate on draft-farrell-perpass-attack
Thread-Topic: Last call debate on draft-farrell-perpass-attack
Thread-Index: Ac8L2J566WAfoCiYS8SS83g99IcfOAAUeXix
Message-ID: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E63346AA@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
References: <015901cf0bc3$72bb75d0$58326170$@olddog.co.uk>, <3B505AB7-E810-447A-B423-8381AE6E4A5B@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <3B505AB7-E810-447A-B423-8381AE6E4A5B@piuha.net>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 04:32:38 -0000
> In any case, as Adrian points out, this document provides no tools for a misbehaving person to use as an argument. which clearly says 'not BCP, this is informational' to me. Lloyd Wood http://about.me/lloydwood ________________________________________ From: ietf [ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jari Arkko [jari.arkko@piuha.net] Sent: 07 January 2014 18:44 To: adrian@olddog.co.uk Cc: ietf@ietf.org Subject: Re: Last call debate on draft-farrell-perpass-attack Thanks, Adrian - this matches pretty closely my own thoughts as well, but you put it in very clear words. And to be honest - we do see over-eager ADs at times (as we sometimes also see over-eager authors, chairs, or working groups…) and I've been over-eager myself at times. Hopefully less often nowadays with more perspective. We all make mistakes. But I've yet to witness a situation where reasonable discussion could not resolve the situation, not to mention the availability of appeals, nomcom comments, recalls, etc. In any case, as Adrian points out, this document provides no tools for a misbehaving person to use as an argument. Jari