Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-tree-validation-02
Linda Dunbar <Linda.dunbar@huawei.com> Fri, 03 August 2018 20:11 UTC
Return-Path: <Linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18734130FA8; Fri, 3 Aug 2018 13:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Linda Dunbar <Linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: sidrops@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-tree-validation.all@ietf.org
Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-tree-validation-02
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.83.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153332707807.18413.5304119074828612207@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 13:11:18 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gFha2XfPIbLTuuFpHf7W91y9bs0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 20:11:18 -0000
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-tree-validation-02 Reviewer: Linda Dunbar Review Date: 2018-08-03 IETF LC End Date: 2018-08-10 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This draft describes one sample implementation of validating the content of RPKI certificate Tree. The description is clear, especially clearly described which section of RFC6487 are based for its implementation. Major issues: None. Minor issues: None. Nits/editorial comments: Section 9.1. the Hash Collisions is more of design in-complete instead of "Security Considerations". So is the section 9.2 In addition, why the implementation description has to be an RFC? clog up the RFCs
- Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sidrops-rpk… Linda Dunbar
- Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sidrops… Randy Bush
- Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sidrops… Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sidrops… Warren Kumari
- Re: [Sidrops] Genart last call review of draft-ie… Rob Austein