Re: A different way to look at the problem
Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Thu, 19 February 2015 16:35 UTC
Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B031A8833 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:35:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iPW2ZEbRm80H for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:35:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-x231.google.com (mail-la0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9559B1A19F8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:35:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by labhz20 with SMTP id hz20so729666lab.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:35:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=WTsIJYTfdwj5wAABjsy8X15ZwDdoOxT+FY5CxfGCa5g=; b=b8qBu96EW0GiMkptMFO6tX3nlUX4JEC8IrNfqkQOlnj54PysDwD4YoIo+GHcbPLNyP NByAo4Zeke3C7pJs1qUIX9rlN9YnsmPG7jA66l6+NYV+4k0Ll5X299YfSkvnxCJAb10W YOcZLh1Yq8+XBaCfUV19QXd47fgHeEJd64jyG0kl6PsWziKfFhb9opLC8GrFPcptTfUj KrQbUUz3vbS0o+OvFpYF+BfnWLIKl5X235/CkoE/DKakBfQkcjEtVGFykU119u66R/nh gaI+iMhOXJhQ059fwlDdSZDke3U5oULYtzZEk2m5f0FvyDHdNP2hNOBuyZFeawBfdjFQ GEFA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.78.37 with SMTP id y5mr4531512lbw.91.1424363707845; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:35:07 -0800 (PST)
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.113.3.165 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:35:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwgxnY-3aVr=xP8YfGh8pe+ujphB2F1Up=uHQH_X8E9Z=w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMm+LwgxnY-3aVr=xP8YfGh8pe+ujphB2F1Up=uHQH_X8E9Z=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:35:07 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: FyLjJ5OHalyvsgysZluZstDTTHQ
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwg3M2-vEpCBoe_LNAcs7Yj+Od9vumebGnVfWz1XN=X+Rg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A different way to look at the problem
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
To: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c3bb70d652d0050f7384b4"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/glNw5rEZMHaap9BwtV-tCkQqYL8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 16:35:11 -0000
Agh, wrong list. Why does Gmail do this? On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker < phill@hallambaker.com> wrote:
- A different way to look at the problem Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: A different way to look at the problem Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: A different way to look at the problem Ted Hardie