Re: Of governments and representation (was: Montevideo Statement)

jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Sat, 12 October 2013 12:02 UTC

Return-Path: <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3062111E8193 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 05:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A-+vDANeiyxr for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 05:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248D811E8146 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 05:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id 2BF7118C0C3; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 08:02:42 -0400 (EDT)
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Of governments and representation (was: Montevideo Statement)
Message-Id: <20131012120242.2BF7118C0C3@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 08:02:42 -0400
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 12:02:48 -0000

    > From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>

    > Reality is different - the outside world expects to hear from us.

I would guess that nobody (almost nobody?)in the IETF objects to I*
leadership representing our views at such things; in fact, I suspect most of
us would find it positively very desirable for the I* to be represented
there. (I certainly do.)

The thing is that I (and I suspect much of the IETF) feel that such I*
leadership attendees need to make it _very_ clear at such events that they are
there to present (as best they can) the views of the IETF as a whole, but they
cannot _commit_ the IETF to anything: only the IETF acting as a whole can do
that.

So, for instance, in signing a statement, they need to say "John Smith,
current Ixx chair, signing as an individual", or something like that - to make
it clear to readers that their signature does not bind the organization as a
whole.

	Noel