Re: The death John McCarthy

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Fri, 04 November 2011 11:53 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE5F21F8C00 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 04:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.514
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.514 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.085, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pj3-PIyAjZN5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 04:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A9B21F8BDE for <IETF@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 04:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CA82CC5A for <IETF@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 13:53:39 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0tDPlJAISVtE for <IETF@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 13:53:38 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BB62CC4D for <IETF@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 13:53:38 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <4EB3D242.9080702@piuha.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:53:38 +0200
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF@ietf.org
Subject: Re: The death John McCarthy
References: <552F103D-2C46-44E6-8CE4-6793DC326E87@gmail.com> <4EA9C9FA.2070905@cisco.com> <9B934167-4C1D-4B91-88AE-434EC169C431@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9B934167-4C1D-4B91-88AE-434EC169C431@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:53:42 -0000

FYI - we talked about the name of the group in the IESG meeting last night. After a review of the thread, the IESG concluded that there is no consensus to change the name of the LISP working group. But judging from the interest in the rest of the discussion, I'm standing by and awaiting for the large amount of feedback that we will get when the main spec goes to IETF Last Call (which is expected to happen soon).

Jari