IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake
Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com> Sat, 04 July 1992 13:55 UTC
Received: from NRI.NRI.Reston.Va.US by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00947; 4 Jul 92 9:55 EDT
Received: from venera.isi.edu by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08285; 4 Jul 92 9:56 EDT
Received: by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.65+local-6) id <AA22234>; Fri, 3 Jul 1992 13:41:22 -0700
Received: from ray.lloyd.COM by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.65+local-6) id <AA22190>; Fri, 3 Jul 1992 13:39:55 -0700
Received: by ray.lloyd.com (4.1/SMI-4.1/Brent-911016) id AA01877; Fri, 3 Jul 92 13:37:57 PDT
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 1992 13:37:57 -0700
From: Brian Lloyd <brian@lloyd.com>
Message-Id: <9207032037.AA01877@ray.lloyd.com>
To: craig@aland.bbn.com
Cc: big-internet@munnari.oz.au, iab@isi.edu, iesg@NRI.Reston.VA.US, ietf@isi.edu, road@lanl.gov
In-Reply-To: Craig Partridge's message of Fri, 03 Jul 92 11:35:21 -0700 <9207031835.AA02858@aland.bbn.com>
Subject: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake
Reply-To: brian@lloyd.com
Reply-To: Craig Partridge <craig@aland.bbn.com> From: Craig Partridge <craig@aland.bbn.com> Date: Fri, 03 Jul 92 11:35:21 -0700 Sender: craig@aland.bbn.com Brian: See my note to Bob Braden of yesterday. The goal is to adopt ISO CLNP and to keep in harmony (the exact words are "functionally compatible" and "convergent") with ISO CLNP. IPv7 is CLNP by another name. Craig I saw it after I made my posting. I am not now quite as enamored of the idea as I originally was. Going with CLNP verbatim implies that we go along with the braindamaged way that ISO wants to assign addresses. In that case I think that CLNP is a bad idea. Rolling something new that borrows from the good features of IP and CLNP but does away with their respective warts is a good thing. Going with CLNP en toto just doesn't seem worth the pain. Brian Lloyd, WB6RQN Lloyd & Associates Principal and Network Architect 3420 Sudbury Road brian@lloyd.com Cameron Park, CA 95682 voice (916) 676-1147 -or- (415) 725-1392
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Dave Piscitello
- IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Brian Lloyd
- IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Brian Lloyd
- re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Garrett.Wollman
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Tim Oldham
- re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Bob Braden
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Noel Chiappa
- re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Craig Partridge
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Lyman Chapin
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Lyman Chapin
- re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Bob Braden
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake dave
- IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Brian Lloyd
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Lyman Chapin
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Steve Deering
- IPv7 == CLNP or CLNP+ ? Bob Hinden
- Re: IPv7 == CLNP or CLNP+ ? vcerf
- re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Dave Piscitello
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Scott Brim
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Milo S. Medin (NASA ARC NSI Office)
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Scott Brim
- IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Dino Farinacci
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Noel Chiappa
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Noel Chiappa
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake James B. Van Bokkelen
- Messages on IPv7 Phill Gross
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Noel Chiappa
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Scott Brim
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Steve Hardcastle-Kille
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Scott Brim
- re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Frank Kastenholz
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Noel Chiappa
- IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake John Moy
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Deborah Estrin
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake William Manning
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Louis A. Mamakos
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Bengt Larsson
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Bob Braden
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Dan Hitchcock
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Frank Kastenholz
- IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Craig Partridge
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Craig Partridge
- re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Craig Partridge
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Deborah Estrin
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Bob Hinden
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Lixia Zhang
- Re: IPv7 (CLNP) a mistake Noel Chiappa