IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: UUID version 6 proposal, initial feedback

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Sat, 01 February 2020 03:03 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6FA12004C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 19:03:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OCZ1GdtnaDg4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 19:03:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADFB9120018 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 19:03:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63C95F3; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 22:03:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 31 Jan 2020 22:03:20 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Q25Qf5 u+7lJqWGqRrC/qk+LlJNYaEdM1tdscRbw+lkU=; b=B2qCzuOYII0dCNskIHF7mO o/yuMdxtlveTa7AEvZnb6nyTRm48J+WhUWumMLPEDPDRx2n/gHRYYHPbt6nqjpcq ZRjpeTRS4ZIU/zXAOXbxYUoqnSGam3nbkb1Ao1P3VWltwTe6D8vHzy3bF5i8lKu8 K996RCM9F55XvqeRhIWlUBrVmSV3UNvrLaslgMrMukVQ+lqnIfZjfsOz2i3u10KO rIhgfxZIZ9yYowkeA/rn2zhvsdWAveJvp2CL50ZsChXEivOWWznSquRt6K13f65F LCZujxGtkTQth2a7Aq9Q2G5K7lEizwt0XBgFNpYI4+4YH3g+JeUoUrK2bGaNhwdQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:d-o0XnF4rE7Kj3il-WG5PCgPT4MqxWrWHwl8zoPNBGkkp8DCU15nEw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrgedugdehgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtsegrtderre dtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhr khdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucfkphepuddtkedrvddvuddrudektddrudehne cuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhr vgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:d-o0XupKq2ny7H26g-cNrHpmCoXDk0_wWfaVd38_YxGGcOWHK8hGvA> <xmx:d-o0XjYMVZyDoAxp2EQhqoe1aR8liD5ZR3jUQxJvr07hxpRPTyuZHQ> <xmx:d-o0XrWrqPQVctfJfmiCAxBIYxkK745iU9yjeeRg8kyPf2TSCsBS9g> <xmx:eOo0Xgyn8lUowFklAbu1dvvPUsvNYMmOWDyAAgu3eI66gUqywI0jFg>
Received: from [192.168.1.97] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B7210328005D; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 22:03:19 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: UUID version 6 proposal, initial feedback
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <D0894516-3F20-4545-BD7D-BE4FA96FAF75@gmail.com> <CABkgnnXSxqqinyK4QiwVv-VuzAraHFUGCrm0K0e9dJX_F80bWg@mail.gmail.com> <D3517A2C-1FCC-42D2-9AB6-248680BE89E1@gmail.com> <c5ba6f5d-7c61-bfdf-63e6-be7d640ee50c@gmail.com> <6E165220-7D1F-4AD8-B4F3-DDCB8F1DA6E2@akamai.com> <b4b73e11-7e21-03ae-0ebf-badcc2bf9d7e@gmail.com> <E49706DE-5A3A-4403-9A0B-F9F4804CFEA1@akamai.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <e8b7b6ab-f238-1d3d-9b1e-9f081c407520@network-heretics.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 22:03:18 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E49706DE-5A3A-4403-9A0B-F9F4804CFEA1@akamai.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------3290C7960B43EAD830D6482A"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/hsL1FUEOVNDr9weJsRtK01HkDag>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2020 03:03:23 -0000

On 1/31/20 9:41 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:

>   * What I laid out is essentially a collection of options that seem
>     to come up time and again dealing with unique identifiers.  I
>     think there is benefit in standardizing it.
>
> Considerations in designing unique identifiers sounds like it could be 
> a worthwhile RFC. I just don’t think they’re UUID’s.
>
I concur.   I think it would be a better proposal if they were called 
something else.

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email