IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-options-registry-01.txt> (IANARegistry for Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) Options) toProposed Standard

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Tue, 03 May 2011 16:16 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B79E06B3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2011 09:16:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -108.691
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.691 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.617, BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jTlhLmXJUKBd for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 May 2011 09:16:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC56E066E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 May 2011 09:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; l=908; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1304439412; x=1305649012; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references; bh=tYImHuVwcEb3GAilnCQabGeiwe7Nt14Zt4H6kv46F0c=; b=fNLCPNFpHycCrGm8n0Az5sHvmuxz9CqcAngUrBeYgS7plYeBFCzzorxD lho4gGbnQCd/N3GbDdC5FjhLUdkupSlORR2QpByrZ6P97P8MuNnhcMHxp k5CsxkICuzpYpaKcmhyaMrBjpgOncLPrT6jPbpTFkLcVr20sOJCmGqkfP Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkoJAGEpwE2tJV2b/2dsb2JhbAClOmF3qEucd4YCBIYliHOEGoo3
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,310,1301875200"; d="scan'208";a="691166120"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 May 2011 16:16:52 +0000
Received: from [192.168.4.100] (rcdn-fluffy-8712.cisco.com [10.99.9.19]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p43GGpkL011697; Tue, 3 May 2011 16:16:51 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-options-registry-01.txt> (IANARegistry for Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) Options) toProposed Standard
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DB9A26C.9010303@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 10:16:51 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2C48CBEA-DC28-4FD2-AE70-807D31555B74@cisco.com>
References: <20110428160138.13587.58242.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4DB9A26C.9010303@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-options-registry@tools.ietf.org, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 16:16:54 -0000

On Apr 28, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:

>> 
>> Network Working Group                                      M. Westerlund
>> Internet-Draft                                                  Ericsson
>> Updates: 
>> 5245
>>  (if approved)                                   C. Perkins
>> Intended status: Standards Track                   University of Glasgow
>> Expires: September 29, 2011                               March 28, 2011
>> 
> I don't see why the intended status for this document is Standards Track.  Wouldn't Informational be enough?  Could you please justify why have you chosen it?

Just wanted to add my 2 cents that I agree this needs to be Standards Track as is is effectively a key part of standards track spec that got, uh, forgotten. Changes to this registration procedure need the standards track level of approval.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email