Updated GSS-API drafts

John Linn 03-Dec-1992 0910 <linn@albeit.enet.dec.com> Thu, 03 December 1992 14:25 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02828; 3 Dec 92 9:25 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02822; 3 Dec 92 9:25 EST
Received: from BITSY.MIT.EDU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11149; 3 Dec 92 9:26 EST
Received: by bitsy.MIT.EDU id AA17919; Thu, 3 Dec 92 09:11:15 EST
Received: from MIT.MIT.EDU by bitsy.MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA17913; Thu, 3 Dec 92 09:11:14 EST
Received: from inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com by MIT.EDU with SMTP id AA27120; Thu, 3 Dec 92 09:11:09 EST
Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA12730; Thu, 3 Dec 92 06:10:47 -0800
Received: by us1rmc.bb.dec.com; id AA25275; Thu, 3 Dec 92 09:08:16 -0500
Message-Id: <9212031408.AA25275@us1rmc.bb.dec.com>
Received: from albeit.enet; by us1rmc.enet; Thu, 3 Dec 92 09:08:21 EST
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 1992 09:08:21 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: John Linn 03-Dec-1992 0910 <linn@albeit.enet.dec.com>
To: galvin@tis.com, internet-drafts@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, cat-ietf@mit.edu
Cc: linn@albeit.enet.dec.com
Apparently-To: internet-drafts@cnri.reston.va.us, galvin@tis.com, cat-ietf@mit.edu
Subject: Updated GSS-API drafts

I posted the updated I-Ds (draft-ietf-cat-genericsec-03.txt and .ps) to
Internet-Drafts on Tuesday, and see that they were put into the I-D
directory (at least on nnsc.nsf.net, where I looked) as of early AM on
Wednesday, the 2nd, though I haven't yet seen the I-D announcement for
them.

--jl

From:	US1RMC::"galvin@TIS.COM" "James M Galvin"  1-DEC-1992 08:27:15.12
To:	John Linn 24-Nov-1992 1559 <albeit::linn>
CC:	cat-ietf@mit.edu, crocker@TIS.COM
Subj:	Re: GSS-API errata 

	Unless there's significant discussion on these points, I believe
	that the resulting spec version is the right one to forward out
	from the CAT WG.  Jim: shall I format to .txt and .ps and mail
	the results to you, or should I submit it as an updated
	Internet-Draft?

Submit it as an internet-draft and as soon as its published we'll see
that its progressed forward.

Thanks,

Jim