IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis)

Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> Fri, 24 February 2012 06:18 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593FB21F8855; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:18:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mpmO3eWpG0GB; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:18:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from srv01.frobbit.se (srv01.frobbit.se [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffe::39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5BA21F8850; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:18:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by srv01.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC7D132869F6; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 07:18:02 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at frobbit.se
Received: from srv01.frobbit.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srv01.frobbit.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mI4+whaUcMLy; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 07:18:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [172.20.10.2] (host-95-199-11-11.mobileonline.telia.com [95.199.11.11]) (Authenticated sender: paf01) by srv01.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BB2132869EF; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 07:18:01 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: WG Review: Recharter of Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis (httpbis)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <20120224025433.00F1A1DC6AEB@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 07:18:00 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F3506C53-D3FC-4814-9F41-1BD404119499@frobbit.se>
References: <20120221181006.43AB121F87BF@ietfa.amsl.com> <4F46BFDF.3070703@dougbarton.us> <20120224025433.00F1A1DC6AEB@drugs.dv.isc.org>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, mnot@mnot.net, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 06:18:06 -0000

On 24 feb 2012, at 03:54, Mark Andrews wrote:

> In message <4F46BFDF.3070703@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton writes:
>> For my money it would be quite important for an HTTP 2.0 definition to
>> make SRV DNS records a full-fledged participant in the standard. Minimum
>> once a month there is someone asking for help on bind-users@ for which
>> the answer is, "The solution to that _would_ be SRV records, if they
>> were supported."
>> 
>> 2782 was published 12 years ago this month. I suppose it can be
>> considered mature enough to deploy at this point? :)
> 
> +1000

Indeed. Including how to handle the comparison of domain name in the URL / domain name in the target in the SRV with the domain name in a cert. I.e. relationship with DANE.

   Patrik

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email