Re: Accepting Internet-Drafts in new RFC format
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 19 March 2019 06:26 UTC
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099781310C7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 23:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bO3F5KbCkP5D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 23:26:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC9D41310C6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 23:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.124] ([84.171.152.246]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MdFwl-1hOcYp2K8J-00ITpp for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 07:26:28 +0100
Subject: Re: Accepting Internet-Drafts in new RFC format
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <B9EB0C52-A523-4AC8-B704-19AD705AC8E6@ietf.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <ee8112af-4f07-b43c-c287-eb8807ef36c7@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 07:26:27 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B9EB0C52-A523-4AC8-B704-19AD705AC8E6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:revr/ZdjFTnaGy7t6OQinoN6tsd8OAFjU4ozHKbzmgHU2v7CfKu iNbOGKs4bCwTqPUE6CZqrGMTr04tWbw3dk1Q/tBZ5KY9bpH+2TvH44qu94TG05lj0keQpX5 nwLmw4+59aJmoRtFAZ8RtPUCZCQrlIh35WmcfjYehERSL2jYcuyzJ/+cNBVvgFVCY5ufyRh BTRRD3ZFl0ZLZ77Vl8UHw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:evHNQvM3Hx0=:FC3g10WrC1QbSsC/QnGBzs bygut0/kck6/+aaP3iiuWcH54EntPL3Zqzh15YD0LW2RpifybvHcZ7vj9+ilBzHc3FZHcfZa8 Q/60Urxx8algFMh3pfmg3mPYEFjaUdaTuNCfEPHLSHsJ8HZT621rx6MMznE4DQTkybknuopzv 6dhzkGxujZuA/Q1oFI1LP8xWBXdiAePfwvRbOV3BZ64vH6X6c5ZZLKRV4FQay2WuQUq2Or+KF 2hy4DwKt77e6LMKCJLuBk7pMBggnvWRQwkbrdpoeuIQ9RVpyNRmqkUlDh2333JaHaV98O9ACY OlGhgSlL/29uK3q2LrNGm6ab5djL0Xn2sMNQ5v/5fHWmxCJU8pbtKgSUdVhwP/Dklxkn0knPM T7p8y9keQDbpVyTpbiNmS3rmsV2uU+MXEj/DmOAVRW9uZPiMTQlAnISz80S/EJ7+LOYy+w+nF oudNWTnouUQ+vtMUNoQu9JcqEy60yVtTVkrovCCDok43LsyVfjgMCnWSfQmnB51VR3lLpFJrF XDsCEJmKQgD/R6wENBAjUoDhdfrD6JjFPKoCp78QQuncwe96I5HstF/pxLGuccVoIUSqGxhkx PjN7OSM9LkjY6ejCsDu7Ac2uKAn2YX1DdMVhXbqEDeIhCbHPPh4EO285Xhq+IBtqSu7cRRqZu 3XhKvECB9XzRTOZ6CWT/6iQ4Fsc+Ws0TMcvBbEjYS+Xn4pKLzbIbtpaWzVuBzMoPDc44n8VwT GmPLLZCV5WxAsMAD3ElgsHyfpRrA0LVTs3jMSgfVEPqe2pkJhjFgD3oKsbaA0eAn6CU3eMcPB lxwCv1T7hPupTkziZOk6dTNTEAkSbhF7hcARzdZiEquwIOA6bPPOcc7MtUJc7Zf8qZhgMdocU XEhsk1Yt0pKXkyBpfQateUNEks1iLSO0FApTURXY3ItLKxEiEToLh5ZK5z6HUl9xKh7eq13nm ikp1xR2SdQQ==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/kj0_s_ZHEgoxcDIUUYW79YF7eKo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 06:26:34 -0000
On 18.03.2019 21:32, IETF Chair wrote: > Greetings, > > As people are likely aware, there has been a long-running project to > update the format of RFCs to allow non-ASCII characters, SVG drawings, > and other enhancements. As background, see RFC 6949 > <https://tools.ietf..org/html/rfc6949> for the requirements and RFC 7991 > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7991> section 1.3 for the major changes. > RFC 7996 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7996>, RFC 7997 > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7997>, and RFC 7998 > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7998> are also useful for more > background and detail. > ... Maybe it should be mentioned that the new format is not exactly what is described in RFC 7991 - see <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levkowetz-xml2rfc-v3-implementation-notes-08> for notes about what is different. It would be great to hear about plans to revise RFC 7991, and how to deal with the issues that have been raised at <https://github.com/rfc-format/draft-iab-xml2rfc-v3-bis/issues>. Best regards, Julian
- Accepting Internet-Drafts in new RFC format IETF Chair
- Re: Accepting Internet-Drafts in new RFC format Julian Reschke