draft-turner-deviceowner-attribute last call comment
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 03 August 2009 19:03 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA813A677C for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.446
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.153, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jkXemOeKW0zQ for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.imagine.ie (dns1.dns.imagine.ie [87.232.1.40]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E15D3A6E8A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:03:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.int.imagine.ie (mail2 [87.232.1.153]) by relay.imagine.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id D168B325DE; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 20:03:31 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.48.10] (dsl-102-234.cust.imagine.ie [87.232.102.234]) by mail2.int.imagine.ie (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n73J3R2C031361 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 3 Aug 2009 20:03:28 +0100
Message-ID: <4A773486.2030905@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:03:34 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Turner, Sean P." <turners@ieca.com>
Subject: draft-turner-deviceowner-attribute last call comment
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0)
X-Canit-Stats-ID: 47066353 - be48e27a1725 (trained as not-spam)
X-CanItPRO-Stream: outgoing
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 87.232.1.53
Cc: pkix <ietf-pkix@imc.org>, IETF-Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:03:32 -0000
Hi Sean, It seems odd to me that the only options for naming a device owner are to use a country code or an OID that might represent a group of countries (or something else). Either this draft is only referring to some very special devices or else its missing *much* more natural identifiers for device owners, e.g. DNS names, email addresses etc. So I think either change the ASN.1 (perhaps to include a GeneralName in the choice) or else change the text to say which kind(s) of device tend to be owned by countries or groups of countries so that readers of the resulting RFC have some kind of clue as to what the document is really about. I guess I'd prefer the former option, but since this is going to be informational am fine with the latter so long as its clear about the kind(s) of device to which the putative RFC is meant to apply. Cheers, Stephen.
- draft-turner-deviceowner-attribute last call comm… Stephen Farrell