IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-02.txt> (Child To Parent Synchronization in DNS) to Proposed Standard

George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> Mon, 11 August 2014 01:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6307D1A00F2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 18:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2eKQSpQaJDAS for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 18:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com (mail-pa0-f49.google.com [209.85.220.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EAB51A00A2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 18:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id hz1so10058618pad.22 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 18:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=a9diVDCMSqvuahBXFmRKEdfrpqqZgvLF+2SFU5/KOFU=; b=bE6TzAHtg0NTScTv4kFn1IDYbHIzzzXtxCYyQX7TGN9w4ZEoZ5EMfgrW8ZK2CYJAVO 8LVOEyxj2aL/CcC+6EehQHEZjfFgB7IBOoczZNOpAxhUA4yvbqEw9PIrNeEU8anIoCii rNLAgWLihjg+7Y7Vsu0kyrkMr47AXDlk9KQC5S+mtTMG7iMUfB9OqGmDPMMWQNCocmFe IgZg1cvfm5t+0w7RsLnKp49zAdfJ6Y8wJ6J7MfB6r8ZHH0qGC9ViYNBOAimFlreIr/3K SqO2acANbpUDqo3LM4NagftDsUtfpEqWQjBq0jPfv6t043E1RJ0s0exKF1FC2SMP3Uxb zJkg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlsb2KlNZxblDLw/wAyvea1xjNGNvF2kFhItbvTQUNk4KEhgfn4SXwEEXt7THjbK9USBc7+
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.222.196 with SMTP id qo4mr38710409pbc.14.1407719436267; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 18:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.135.68 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Aug 2014 18:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [203.119.42.6]
In-Reply-To: <m2zjfbx31s.wl%randy@psg.com>
References: <20140808151621.1148.70609.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <53E7D16B.3020301@bogus.com> <m2zjfbx31s.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 11:10:36 +1000
Message-ID: <CAKr6gn0Qf7AAfvgY2FqB1AM7g_3BH2a24rogG2h6yARAMzLK8g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-02.txt> (Child To Parent Synchronization in DNS) to Proposed Standard
From: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b2ede71f149650500503862"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/kwSEsOGpU5MFpJyDYCYktlgT4Mw
Cc: IETF Disgust <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 01:10:38 -0000

the 02 draft of child syncronization refers to
dnsop-delegation-trust-maint.

are you saying you want one document? they appear to do slightly different
things. One signals DS/DNSKEY update and nothing else. The other has a
flagword capable notation and signals intent about immediacy or SOA timed
change, in and out of baliwick, and the NS list.

I could imagine a net win by the authors banging this into one document.
YMMV

G


On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> as the threat models seem similar why do we need two separate
> mechanisms, one for NS
>    draft-ietf-dnsop-child-syncronization-02.txt
> and one for DS
>    draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-trust-maintainance-14.txt
>
> randy
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email