specific questions about RFC publication and I-Ds
Pete Loshin <pete@loshin.com> Wed, 27 September 2000 22:20 UTC
Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id SAA23868 for ietf-outbound.10@ietf.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 18:20:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from chmls05.mediaone.net (chmls05.mediaone.net [24.147.1.143]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id SAA23363 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 18:06:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from gateway (h00a0c5e1478f.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.211.223]) by chmls05.mediaone.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id SAA18484 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 18:06:27 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <4.1.20000927174603.0401f100@pop.ne.mediaone.net>
X-Sender: rapo@mail130.pair.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 18:01:07 -0400
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: Pete Loshin <pete@loshin.com>
Subject: specific questions about RFC publication and I-Ds
In-Reply-To: <200009272030.QAA23942@astro.cs.utk.edu>
References: <Your message of "Wed, 27 Sep 2000 13:04:32 PDT." <030401c028be$280b4b60$0ab344ab@spandex>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Loop: ietf@ietf.org
OK, I've got some very specific questions about RFCs and I-Ds and the RFC Editor queue. The IESG announces via mailing list when a document or protocol action is being taken; as far as I can tell this always means that an I-D has been approved for publication as an RFC and that I-D is then released to the RFC Editor to get an RFC number and be published. Questions: 1. Does the RFC Editor make any changes to the I-D other than changing internal references to the document from the I-D identifier to the RFC number, and changes specified by the IESG? More specifically, does the RFC Editor have the option of doing things like fixing spelling and grammer errors (if any)? 2. The RFC Editor queue (http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue.html) lists various documents along with information about where they stand in the process. The first entry in the queue this afternoon was this: ----start excerpt from RFC Editor's queue---- ---------------------------------------- IETF STANDARDS TRACK (by date received) ---------------------------------------- 1999/09/16 draft-ietf-mpls-arch-07.txt REF draft-ietf-mpls-atm-04.txt draft-ietf-mpls-bgp4-mpls-04.txt draft-ietf-mpls-cr-ldp-04.txt draft-ietf-mpls-framework-05.txt draft-ietf-mpls-fr-06.txt draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-10.txt draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-lsp-tunnel-06.txt draft-ietf-mpls-label-encaps-08.txt E. Rosen, A. Viswanathan, R. Callon Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture ----end excerpt from RFC Editor's queue---- The "REF" indicates (according to the same page) that "REF=holding for normative reference (followed by ID string of referenced document)." Does this particular entry mean <draft-ietf-mpls-arch-07.txt> is being held for normative reference to the I-Ds listed below it, or that all those I-Ds are being held for normative references? 3. Assuming that the entry above indicates that the first I-D (in this case, <draft-ietf-mpls-arch-07.txt>) is being held until the other RFCs become RFCs as well, doesn't this mean that it might be years before an approved I-D would ever be published as an RFC? Thanks! -pl +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | Pete Loshin http://www.loshin.com | | Internet-Standard.com http://Internet-Standard.com | | The RFC Books Series http://www.loshin.com/bigbooks.html | | The Linux Project http://www.thelinuxproject.com | +-------------------------------------------------------------+