Re: IETF108 email/attendee list question
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 11 June 2020 22:33 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726AE3A092D; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 15:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3k0ZEYCDcjIr; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 15:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C27E3A0927; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 15:33:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.42.112] (p5089ae91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.174.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49jdtq6NhlzySL; Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:33:55 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Subject: Re: IETF108 email/attendee list question
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200611222736.GY16371@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:33:55 +0200
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 613607635.432382-d873d69b14d495faa45f044eff57e6ed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <508AE1D4-3A59-4138-BE21-31AFE459066F@tzi.org>
References: <20200611222736.GY16371@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/lbUAZBL8PGvg6s9nVfT8SYwkHQM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 22:34:00 -0000
On 2020-06-12, at 00:27, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote: > > Q: Are there the usual 108attendees/108all mailing lists ? > > I could find no evidence for them on mailarchive.ietf.org, > but i also do not see no such address errors coming back from sending test > email to 108attendees, but i am not receiving emails sent to it. I saw Toerless’ test email, so the 108attendees list exists. In this test email, Archived-At: says: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/108attendees/9fTVOqiw7ajDYG6LkAuX5gnZGOM but that archive 404s. Secretariat notified. Grüße, Carsten
- IETF108 email/attendee list question Toerless Eckert
- Re: IETF108 email/attendee list question Carsten Bormann