Re: IETF Last Call on draft-funk-eap-ttls-v0-04.txt
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 29 April 2008 19:25 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2FA428C31A; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3020F28C2F2 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ajv5kEgoCmNc for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957F428C31A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.piuha.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E169419877E; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:25:12 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by smtp.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779C0198713; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:25:12 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <48177617.7050308@piuha.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:25:11 +0300
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14ubu (X11/20080306)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF Last Call on draft-funk-eap-ttls-v0-04.txt
References: <BLU137-W10F5FA83BBF401628C840B93D90@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BLU137-W10F5FA83BBF401628C840B93D90@phx.gbl>
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, paulfunk@alum.mit.edu
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Thanks for your review, Bernard. Paul is about to prepare a new version based on IESG review comments. Can you take care of Bernard's suggestions at the same time? Jari Bernard Aboba kirjoitti: > Overall this document looks good. I only have two minor comments. > > Section 12.2 > > "For EAP-TTLSv0, the Peer-Id is null." > > I agree that the Peer-Id is null in the case where there is server-only > authentication and no cryptographic binding, since in this case, the > identity of the peer entity contributing to the keying material is not > known. > > However, when client certificate authentication is used in Phase 1, I > would suggest that the Peer-Id is defined as in [RFC5216] Section 5.2. > > NITs: > Change [RFC2716bis] to [RFC5216] everywhere. _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf